Sign up for our newsletter

In The Car: Esquith’s Real Talk To Himself

“For about a minute, I focus on things that have me worried or sad. You might call it a prayer or a moment of meditation. But whatever you call it, I take a few moments to pause and just think…I think of everything possible that could get me down. And I remind myself to leave those problems in the car. They have no place in Room 56. There are kids there with problems far greater than mine, and without the adult sensibilities to handle them.” Rafe Esquith, Real Talk for Real Teachers.

The Center for Education Reform (CER) is a leading advocate for issues related to charter schools, teacher quality, online learning, standardized testing, and federal policy. CER aims to make sure that parents are aware of school choice, that teachers make use of their resources, and that all students receive the education that they deserve. Rafe Esquith, a fifth grade teacher at Hobart Elementary School in Los Angeles, shines as an educator. CER, in regards to the issue of teacher quality, believes that teachers carry a heavy influence over their students. Therefore, it is imperative that children are taught by the best, and that the best should be rewarded for their hard work.

In Real Talk for Real Teachers, Esquith offers advice to the 22-year-old with a baccalaureate starting out his or her career as a teacher and to the master of the classroom who began perfecting the art of education…well, years ago. Nonetheless, Esquith suggests for both the young folks and those more experienced in the profession to not only believe in Churchill’s concept of never ever giving up, but to also put their students first.

As Esquith tells his students on a daily basis, a task cannot be accomplished some of the time; nor can it be accomplished most of the time. A task can only be accomplished if it is done all the time. Therefore, effective teachers are the ones who plan and care for their students all of the time. Throughout his book, Esquith mentions that teaching is a profession that comes with much joy, but it is also one that holds many challenges. A teacher must decide whether or not he or she will burn out in front of their students or burn brighter for them.

Esquith chooses to burn brighter. Like any person, Esquith is worried about buying his wife, Barbara, the new kitchen she has been longing for and cannot seem to help thinking about his daughter struggling with her pregnancy. His problems and concerns for other people and even for himself are very real, but he chooses to leave them in the car. There are students in his classroom, however, who truly struggle. Their problems are not only real to Esquith, but also tangible; their problems touch his heart. Esquith is not trying to “save” every student, but rather he desires to open doors for the children in his classroom. However, it must be the student’s choice whether or not to walk through those doors.

An effective teacher does not push, but encourages his or her students to take initiatives. CER takes the initiative to ensure that teachers like Esquith are the ones who will be teaching our future students. They wake up in the morning, drive to school, park the car, think about their own problems, and leave those thoughts in the car. They then help their students grow academically, but more so personally in the classroom. They drive home—planning a lesson or two on the way back and can hardly wait to teach it the next day.

There may be nothing new under the sun to an experienced teacher, but challenges will always exist. The effective teacher, like Esquith and those that the CER believe in, welcome all obstacles and overcome them—all the time. I hope to become a teacher someday myself. The response I usually receive is: “Why? You could do anything – why would you want to teach?”

Days after my high school graduation, I went back to visit. I saw one of my teachers, who quite frankly I never felt knew how to teach, and he asked me how I thought I did on the AP exam. In my heart, I was thinking, “How do you think I did having you as a teacher?” But I just said, “Pretty good, I think. I’m hoping for a 4.” He replied back, “You’re not good enough to get a 4. Maybe a 3” and because I had already graduated, I had that power to leave him standing there in the hallway without so much as a goodbye. I just left him with a smile, something I do out of habit.

However, the reality is that some students do not have that ability to leave—they must stay in the classroom with that one teacher for the entire school year! I did not care about how my teacher thought I would do on the exam; I did well for myself and that was all that mattered to me. I do care, though, that he told me—to my face—that I was not good enough. So teachers, I tell you: NEVER tell your students they are not good enough unless you want to encourage low expectations and widen the achievement gap.

Part of the reason I want to teach will always relate back to that dream of being able to decorate my classroom walls, buy teacher clothes, and teach A Separate Peace. However, more of it has to do with the fact that I never want any student to leave my classroom thinking he or she is “not good enough.” In the same manner Esquith leaves his worries in the car, I will tell my students to leave such thought alone—or better yet get rid of them not just some or most of the time, but all of the time. That type of negativity will not have a place in Room…TBA.

Navraj Narula, CER Intern

NASA And Its Partnership With STEM Educational Programs

On Thursday, July 31st the CER staff and interns embarked on a tour of the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). During our visit, we gained knowledge on the variety of internships, fellowships, and scholarships offered by NASA, walked through the Integration Testing (I&T) and Innovation labs, and we had the opportunity to learn about the Optimus Prime – STEM challenge presentation.

NASA team members stressed the importance and need for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educational programs, emphasizing that it is the main pipeline for filling high-skilled jobs demanded by their industry. In addition, NASA members urged us to continue our fight in support of science and engineering-based programs. As tour guides walked us around rooms filled with complex pieces of machinery that produced even more intricate parts, it was evident that these tasks were meant for highly qualified and trained individuals.

Through persistent efforts, NASA recruits and develops individuals who are interested in the sciences and engineering. Its One Stop Shopping Initiative (OSSI) is an innovative, mission-enabling, NASA-wide approach to help build links to bring together STEM education programs and workforce needs, as well as to attract and motivate talented young people. The Optimus Prime (OP) challenge, named after the fan favorite and lead Transformer, is one such program. One high school-aged intern in the Optimus Prime challenge program left us all in awe as she presented a three-dimensional virtual world she and her fellow high school interns had created from scratch. As if this was not impressive enough, we were all surprised to learn that she taught herself how to use the computer program as well. Extraordinary NASA interns in high school, college, or graduate school serve as evidence that STEM programs are necessary for providing a venue for individuals to develop and express their ideas.

Many of these ideas and products created at NASA became everyday tools for people in the public. NASA has coined this transition as a “spinoff.” Spinoffs have impacted many aspects of our every-day life. For instance, in the health industry, water treatment technologies inspired healthy beverages and telescope innovations improved speed and accuracy of eye surgeries. In the transportation industry, anti-ice formulas now prevent train delays and shuttle repair tools are now used to automate vehicle maintenance.

All in all, by taking a step back to really digest my experiences on the tour, I came to the understanding that we are witnessing an ongoing cycle that yields progress. First, STEM education programs are nurturing and growing the minds of students. Next, organizations such as NASA do their part in bringing their students into the workforces where they can further develop their skills by applying them to real world problems. Finally, ideas that were once dormant in the minds of students become active and find their way out of the lab, and get injected into society to help promote human progress.

Tigran Avakyan, CER Intern

CER Interns on Capitol Hill

On Tuesday July 29th, the CER Interns had a unique opportunity to meet with Katherine Haley, policy advisor to John Boehner, the Speaker of the House. As we walked through the marble halls of the United States Capitol building, the echoes of our group’s excitement bounced off the walls. We marveled at the architecture and muttered a continuous, “Wow this is so beautiful.” Our excitement only escalated as we were escorted into a conference room where we waited for Ms. Haley.

Ms. Haley has been working on Capitol Hill for 12 years, and has been working with Speaker Boehner for more than five of those years. Prior to her life on Capitol Hill, Ms. Haley spent her undergraduate years taking pre-med classes in anticipation of pursuing a degree in medicine. After graduation, she decided to spend her summer applying to medical school and interning on the hill in Washington, D.C. Ms. Haley said it was during this summer that she had her “ah-ha” moment, at which point she realized she wanted to begin her career in policy. Ms. Haley went on to describe what she has learned from working in Washington, D.C., such as how networking is a crucial aspect of being here and how it helped her move along from one job to the next.

We discussed the policy that Ms. Haley has seen go through her office regarding education, such as the No Child Left Behind Act, and the more recent Student Success Act. One of her focuses in this position has been changing policy to consolidate the current funding for elementary and secondary schools into fewer funding streams. She said that this may be a bold move, but it will allow schools to be dealt with on a more local level.

I found it particularly interesting when Ms. Haley brought up a comparison of how the United States sees education versus other countries around the world. She mentioned how certain countries value their teachers as some of the most respected professionals in the workforce, whereas teachers in the U.S. are not treated this way.

It was an honor to have the opportunity to meet with Ms. Haley, such an intelligent and influential person in policy. All of the interns were very grateful that she was able to take the time out of her day to speak with us and give us advice regarding education policy.

Mandy Leiter, CER Intern

The Last Day: A Summer At CER

I’m 336 hours into my summer internship with The Center for Education Reform, and today is my last day. When I first arrived at the office in Bethesda, I was unsure of what the summer had in store for me. I knew that I pursued this internship to learn more about education policy and reform, but I had a very abstract idea of why this really mattered to me. After these eight weeks, I now know how critically necessary reform is in the policy discussion. I am also just relieved to know that there are so many different voices involved in education policy, which I was uncertain of prior to my time here.

In my first blog post, I expressed interest in developing a comprehensive understanding of core education issues and proposed solutions. I am pleased to say that not only do I have a more in-depth grasp of the concepts, but I am now able to be more critical of arguments and ideas concerning reform. After being exposed to various voices in education policy and reform, I have seen and heard from different sides of the same issue. I am proud of how much I have learned in such a compressed amount of time.

The different research projects, events, and discussions that I have experienced during my time at CER have helped me to cultivate my own opinions on issues. I came in with a fuzzy conception of education reform, and a limited scope of possible solutions. I have had the opportunity to learn more about issues that I had not previously focused on. For instance, getting exposure to STEM education in action at the Goddard Space Flight Center really awakened me to the importance of STEM education outreach efforts. Researching all of the charter schools opening in fall has not only shown me how important charter schools are to our educational system, but how different they can be in their goals and operations.

I have also met so many people engaged in public policy and working in education reform. This has been a wonderful opportunity to not only learn about the issues, but all of the different ways in which people are deciding to tackle the issues. At various events, including the one hosted by my colleagues and I, I have met people from all kinds of career trajectories and work environments. Even among the CER staff and my fellow interns, I have learned so much about how and where I can be active in the policy reform movement. Every bit of this internship has been a learning experience, and I am very proud of every new skill that I have learned, every new name that I have heard, and every challenge that I have met.

I grew a lot this summer. All in all, I worked towards my goals and learned more than I could imagine concerning education policy and reform. I’m excited to have a more concrete understanding of the field and now I can move forward in my professional development knowing that education policy is definitely in my future. To the CER staff and my fellow interns, thank you for a wonderful summer.

Adiya Taylor, CER Intern

The Importance of School Choice

I am proud to say that my intern friends—Adiya Taylor, Mandy Leiter, Matt Beienburg, Tigran Avakyan—and I hosted a very successful event: “CER Interns Present: The Next Generation in Education Reform.” I would like to extend a thank-you to the Thomas B. Fordham Institute for letting us use their space as well as to the staff at CER for their encouragement and support throughout this entire process—which, I’m sad to say, is now over.

Our speakers were also instrumental in transforming our event from a small idea that started in a conference room to a reality that ended up in about 40 attendees, eagerly asking questions and inclined to network.

Kara Kerwin, Daniel Lautzenheiser, Jack McCarthy, Michael Musante, and Amber Northern are experts in their fields regarding education policy and certainly had a lot to bring to the table. Our moderator, Tigran Avakyan, engaged them in discussions regarding teacher tenure, technology use in the classroom, and the return on investment. Charter schools were also a prominent topic that came up.

I’ve been thinking a lot about charter schools, actually. I first heard the term “charter school” in a class at college, and I never thought about it later after that semester. I am close to completing my first internship here at CER and only now can I truly tell you what it means. Charter schools are innovative, public schools that are free from regulations set forth by the government. They serve some of the most disadvantaged students and are kept accountable for their results. New charter schools are always opening up as well. For instance, 11 charter schools are expected to open up in the DC area alone this coming fall. Many charter schools—new or having already existed for a while—may also face closure in the future due to a lack of resources. This is quite unfortunate considering the fact that charter schools are beginning to serve an increasing number of students.

I do not think that I will ever forget McCarthy’s anecdote about the Josiah Quincy school in Boston. A while back, McCarthy worked for a real investment firm in Boston. His friend, who wanted to start a charter school, believed that McCarthy would be able to provide him with a building. As the process went on in starting up the charter, McCarthy mentioned that 1,600 people had applied for 600 available seats. There was a “mass of humanity in the gymnasium.” Many people were dissatisfied with the school choice options in the Boston area and made a conscious choice to put their faith into a new school. Names were being pulled out of a hat—as if it were a lottery. The 1,000 people whose names did not get called simply cried, and McCarthy mentioned that he did as well. It was a “moving experience.”

Though 1,000 people were unable to secure a place in the Josiah Quincy school, those 1,000 people were still greeted by choice in the form of a charter. McCarthy ended his anecdote by stating that charter schools do not cream people—it’s “baloney.” I completely agree with him. I still wonder about those 1,000 people, though. Did the charter not get enough funding to enroll more than 600 students? Did those parents ever get a “choice” option later? I hope so.

I learned many things from our event, especially how to work well with a team, but more importantly, I learned of my passion for charter schools. All our speakers—from such diverse backgrounds and organizations—were able to agree that charter schools are a positive school-choice option. I join in with the panelists in saying that I do, too.

Once more, I thank them all for their contributions. I am excited to see how things will turn out when CER hosts their next event!

Navraj Narula, CER Intern

Policy and Professionalism: Lessons Learned From Education Reform Advocates

On Tuesday, interns from various public policy organizations piled onto a 7th floor conference room where CER’s interns organized a panel discussion titled, CER Interns Present: The Next Generation in Education Reform. Preceding the panel, interns from The Center for Education Reform, the U.S. Department of Education, The Fund for America Studies, The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, The Brookings institution, and many other organizations mingled and shared stories of their experiences within their respective organizations.

Panelists sat before the future reformers to discuss current policy issues along with providing any insights that they may have concerning working in education. There was a full house of reformers featuring Kara Kerwin, President of The Center for Education Reform, Daniel Lautzenheiser, Education Policy Program Manager for the American Enterprise Institute, Jack McCarthy, President and CEO of AppleTree Institute of Education Innovation, Michael Musante, Senior Director of Government Relations for FOCUS DC, and Amber Northern, Vice president of Research for The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. The event covered a multitude of topics ranging from common criticisms of charter schools to the return on investment in education spending. The panelists also engaged in a fruitful discussion on the use of technology in the classroom and opinions on teacher tenure and union involvement in reform.

After the panel, the audience members posed challenging questions on political philosophy and bipartisan efforts, career trajectories, and classroom strategies.

Here are some of the important messages that I took away from the event

  • When discussing the achievement gap, Michael Musante mentioned that a “classroom can feel like a prison” for a ninth grader who reads at a third-grade level. This really spoke to the importance of standards and expected outcomes for all students.
  • Amber Northern commented that, “Technology is at its best when it questions the assumptions of what we’ve been doing in classrooms, and actually then enhances teaching and learning.” At an event speaking about reform, it was beneficial to discuss the available directions to steer the reform movement.
  • Daniel Lautzenheiser spoke to how the changing policy landscape has the potential to enhance research in the future; specifically, he commented on how education savings accounts may make it easier to track the flow of spending.
  • Jack McCarthy on the “humbling” experience of being an intern: “You are idealistic and naïve, and trusting and believing, and energetic and passionate. You’re sort of throwing yourself into these situations, and sometime you get bruised, and your feelings get hurt, and you feel diminished. But it’s sort of like that process of the tide coming in and cleaning up the beach every twelve hours…You will work in dysfunctional environments, but you may get the opportunity to create your own environment with your own values in the future.”
  • Kara Kerwin added an insightful point towards the end of the panel, “If you know what you really believe in or stand for, you will find a career path that will make your life much more enriched.”

In the end, I found the event to be inspiring and informative.

Adiya Taylor, CER Intern

Funding Comprehensives and Charters

On July 21st, I attended an event at the American Enterprise Institute called “Comprehending Comprehensive Universities.” A fitting title – since my exact purpose in visiting the institute was to learn more about what a comprehensive university is. KC Deane, Aspen Institute’s College Excellence Program Manager, spoke to this question first.

Like many other panelists, she defined a comprehensive university by what it is not. A comprehensive university is not a research university. It is also not a community college or a flagship institution. Rather, a comprehensive university is best defined as a four-year, public university. Alisha Hicklin Fryar, an associate professor of political science at the University of Oklahoma, urged the audience to think of “state schools and the University of’s;” Fryar insisted that most of these schools will be comprehensive universities, and often times the backbone of higher education. Her research indicates that 69% of undergraduates are enrolled in such institutions. Diversity in student population is largely present: 74% Latino, 70% Native American, and 65% African-Americans. Comprehensive universities are also diverse in size, ranging from 711 to 56,326 students. They are located in 400 of 535 congressional districts.

Fryar further mentioned that the majority of students enrolled in comprehensive universities are graduate students, studying topics focusing on education, business, and health. Such institutions work to train a large majority of the workforce, yet they are only minimally studied (compared to community colleges, research universities, etc.). They also receive less funding than other university models.

In a way, comprehensive universities remind me of charter schools – a lot of people today do not know exactly how to define a charter perhaps in the same way that they might not know how to define a comprehensive university. Yet, much like comprehensives, charter schools serve a larger part of the American student population than the public realizes. Still, they receive little attention and also not enough funding.

William Doyle, an associate professor of higher education at Vanderbilt University, stated that the goal of a comprehensive university is to increase the production of bachelor degrees—to prepare students for a successful future after college. The inputs include the faculty, students, and money. The output is simply the degree. If we desire to increase bachelor degree production, money must be spent at the comprehensive university.

I think back to charters once more. During the first semester of my sophomore year in Boston, I visited one of the elementary schools in the Boston Collegiate Charter Schools chain. All the homeroom teachers decorated their classrooms in accordance with their alma mater in an effort to instill in the minds of their students that college can be a possibility for them. This charter school, like a comprehensive university, is working to pave the way for future movers and shakers – yet they do not receive adequate funding despite providing services to the majority of the population.

Jeffrey Selingo, the author of “College (Un)bound” continued to state that comprehensive universities are innovative. Austin Peay State University developed a program called “Degree Compass,” which takes in student data and enables advisors to provide more accurate guidance to students so as to enhance their college careers. This program has worked very well and Selingo states that the University of Massachusetts – Amherst might adopt this program as well.  This also speaks to the innovation of charters – so many of the clips I read from The Media Bullpen speak of news about a new online tool or an afterschool program to improve students’ proficiency in math to meet state standards. Comprehensive universities are clearly doing the same.

Kim Clark, senior writer for Money Magazine, concludes that like K-12 schools, comprehensive universities are teaching the toughest crowds. I believe that charter schools are as well. Attending this event was a very humbling experience. I learned something new and was able to connect it back to something I have heard talked about at Boston University’s School of Education and at The Center for Education Reform.

Both comprehensive universities and charter schools serve so much of the student population – they certainly deserve more attention from both our citizens and our government, and from me as a future educator even more.

Navraj Narula, CER Intern

Charter Schools Make The Most of Public Funding

New Evidence Finds Charter Schools More Cost Effective and Yield a Greater Return on Investment

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
July 22, 2014

Charter schools are on average more cost effective in delivering learning gains than traditional public schools, according to a new report released today by the University of Arkansas.

The first of its kind, “The Productivity of Public Charter Schools,” conducted on a national scale, analyzes the cost effectiveness and return on investment in the public education system.

“Not only are charter schools doing more with less, they are on the whole demonstrating a superior ability to act as responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars,” said Kara Kerwin, president of The Center for Education Reform. “The importance of this body of research cannot be understated, as it ties charter funding to the most important aspect of education – student outcomes.”

For every $1,000 invested, charter schools delivered 17 additional points in math and 16 additional points in reading on the eighth grade National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Cost effectiveness was most pronounced in the District of Columbia, where charter schools were 109 percent more cost effective in terms of math scores, and 122 percent more cost effective in reading.

According to the Center for Education Reform’s 2014 Survey of America’s Charter Schools, charter schools on average received 36 percent less funding during the 2012-13 school year.

“These findings make funding inequities at the state level between charter and traditional schools all the more egregious,” said Kerwin. “Imagine the influence public charter schools could have on U.S. student outcomes if they received money in the same manner and the same amount as traditional public schools, including funding for facilities.”

“It’s critical lawmakers take note, as this research underscores the importance of having strong fiscal equity provisions in a state’s charter school law.”

A New, Innovative Way to Help Children Master Social and Emotional Learning

Meet Mose.

Mose is a highly functional 8 1/2 year old kid with Asperger syndrome who plays an adventure game called IF… to help him understand and manage his emotions.

Brendan, Mose’s father, says, “Mose, like a lot of aspie kids, is smart enough to recognize that he doesn’t totally fit in with everybody else, but doesn’t have the social and emotional intelligence to know what to do about it. I feel like the IF… game has given us tools to talk about his fears, and what is going on in his head when on the surface he gets angry at school, and how underneath he might be feeling guilty or insecure – like Cinda and her baby vim in the game.”

Watch below to hear more about how IF… has helped Brendan and Mose, straight from Mose himself:

CER Condemns Florida Lawsuit Against Voucher Program

Shameless Attempt by Union to Hinder Florida’s School Choice Legacy

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
July 16, 2014

The Center for Education Reform strongly condemns the lawsuit brought by the Florida Education Association (FEA) against the recent expansion of Florida’s tax credit scholarship program and newly created personal learning scholarship accounts.

“In typical knee-jerk fashion, the FEA is resisting anything that allows students, including those with special needs, to move beyond their zip code and find the learning option right for them,” said Kara Kerwin, president of The Center for Education Reform.

There are close to 60,000 K-12 students taking advantage of Florida’s tax credit scholarships in 2014, representing approximately three percent of the state’s 5-17 year-old school-aged population. The state legislature earlier this year approved and the governor signed a strengthening of the program by making more families eligible for these scholarships, which are funded by private charitable donations.

“The FEA would have us believe they’re deeply concerned about the integrity of the legislative process, which is utter nonsense,” Kerwin said. “This is nothing more than an attempt to deny new opportunities for more families and to preserve an often-failing, one-size-fits-all system.”

Florida is one of two states to earn an “A” on The Center for Education Reform’s School Choice Today: Education Tax Credit Scholarships Ranking & Scorecard 2014. Combined with its automatic escalator clause to meet parental demand for more opportunities, Florida’s recent eligibility expansion bolstered an already strong tax credit program for families in need of educational choices.

“As the 2014 School Accountability Report recently released by the Florida Department of Education indicates, educational options are working. Taking this scholarship option away from families would be a huge disservice to Florida students,” said Kerwin.