Sign up for our newsletter

Newswire: May 14, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 19

GOOD at ENCOURAGING DROPOUTS (GED). As states across the nation are called to increase high school graduation rates, there’s a growing concern about the value of the GED and state policies that encourage dropouts. As the Washington Post points out, educators and economists alike are calling for stricter access to the GED. Historically, the test was designed to give struggling students and dropouts a new lease on life and get them back on track to pursue higher education or secure a decent job. But in reality the test is encouraging dropouts, according to James Heckman, Nobel Prize winning economist at the University of Chicago, and very few GED test-takers are seeking out higher education. What’s more, employers have found no difference in workplace success between dropouts and those that have completed the GED. So why the increase in students pursuing the GED when there’s little evidence of future success? In some states, like in Maryland, students that complete the GED are granted a high school diploma and are encouraged to do so at age 16! So instead of creating better educational opportunities to keep students engaged in pursuit of success, they are pushing them out the door younger and inflating academic attainment. Lawmakers across the country need to wake up. Maryland may rank #1 according to some, but the reality is most states, including Maryland, are barely making the grade.

MOTHER KNOWS BEST. Vincent Peña is one high school senior that shows us the sky is the limit when given access to better educational opportunities. Over the weekend Vincent became the first person in his family to earn a college degree – an associate degree from Ivy Tech. He’ll receive his high school diploma later in June before going on to Perdue University in the fall. He was especially thankful for his mom this Mother’s Day. Vincent told the Gary Post Tribune, “Mother knows best,” for seeking out the 21st Century Charter School in eighth grade when she increasingly became dissatisfied with the traditional public schools. Kevin Teasley, founder and CEO of the GEO Foundation which operates 21st Century said, “We get our kids exposed to college, and if they put their minds to it they can earn their associate degree on our dime.” Teasley continued, “This kid is getting an honors diploma and an associate degree on the same amount we’d spend on others who are just getting a diploma. But the issue is much more than just stretching the taxpayer dollar, it’s breaking the cycle of poverty.” Not only does 21st Century have the top graduation rate in Gary at 95.2%, it beat the statewide average graduation rate of 88.38% in 2012. Moms really do know best and when lawmakers afford them true Parent Power, all students do better.

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. The freedom and flexibility that led to the success of Vincent noted above might be at-risk. Over the weekend, Governor Pence signed legislation that has good intentions but will most likely result in unintended consequences. The new law empowers Indiana’s state department of education to become more involved in the day-to-day operations of charter schools. As we’ve pointed out time and time again, quality charter schools are directly correlated to quality authorizers. States with multiple, independent authorizers – independent legally and managerially from existing local and state education agencies – produce more and better opportunities for students. Be sure to check out our new paper on model charter authorizers and why some models, while well-intentioned, have unintended consequences.

MY CHILD MY CHOICE. From coast to coast there’s been a flurry of activity among parents – especially moms – demanding school choice. Families in the Big Apple stormed city hall this morning to announce 50,400 NYC students (enough to fill Yankee Stadium) are on charter school waiting lists. Parents and school leaders also gathered in Harrisburg, PA today to rally in support of more charter and cyber charter school options. Over 100,000 students across Texas were reported to have been on charter school waiting lists last year. So it comes as no surprise that a recent poll by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice found overwhelming support for school choice among moms of school-aged children. This recent study adds to two decades of data proving that the majority of Americans support better educational options for all our children.

CER AT 20. In case you missed it, today we announced a preliminary list of confirmed participants for CER’s 20th Anniversary Celebration – Conference, Gala and Rat Pack EdReformies – on October 9, 2013 in Washington, DC. Honorees, speakers, participants and the full day’s events can be found here.

Schooling in America Survey: What Do Mothers Say About K-12 Education

A survey by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice polled a group of “school moms” who had at least one child in preschool, elementary school or high school and asked them several questions on the state of education in America. Some interesting findings from the survey:

• School moms were much more likely to favor charter schools than oppose them. When charter schools weren’t defined, 45% favored charters and only 19% opposed. When given a definition, the percentage of moms in favor of charters went up to 63%. For American adults without children in school, the numbers were almost identical. This is something that CER has been saying and seeing in our polling for a while. Last year, CER did an independent poll and found similar results in North Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida.

• Seven out of 10 school moms were in support of tax credits, 19% were opposed and 12% had no opinion. American adults similarly support tax credit scholarships.

• Close to two-thirds of school moms (65%) support education savings accounts (ESAs), a new type of school choice reform that allows parents to put a portion of their public school funding into a savings account for use for primary, secondary or post-secondary education needs One-quarter of school moms (25%) said they opposed ESAs. Less than one out of ten school moms (9%) did not express an opinion.

• When given the definition for a school voucher program, six out of ten American adults (60%) said they support the policy – up four points since last year. About one third, 32%, are opposed.

• When considering the various actions that could occur from a parent trigger policy, both groups supported a school choice option. One out of three school moms (32%) and one-fourth of non-schoolers (26%) say that offering a voucher or scholarship to enroll in another school was the best trigger outcome to serve affected students and families.

Major Anniversary Conference and Awards Gala Lineup Announced

Honorable William J. Bennett, Education Commissioner Tony Bennett, Charter Pioneer Yvonne Chan, PA. Rep. Dwight Evans, Entrepreneurs Jon Hage and Deborah McGriff, among honorees and presenters

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
May 14, 2013

The Center for Education Reform (CER) announced today a preliminary list of confirmed participants for its 20th Anniversary Celebration – Conference, Gala and Rat Pack EdReformies on October 9, 2013 in Washington, DC. Honorees, speakers and participants in the full day’s events also include:

• Media personality Michelle Bernard
• Honorable Kevin Chavous
• Connections Education President Barbara Dreyer
• Activist reformers Howard Fuller and Lisa Graham Keegan
• Ted Kolderie, founder of the charter school movement
• The Gleason Family Foundation: Tracy, Jim and Janis
• NJ education committee director Melanie Schulz
• Georgia Representative Alisha Thomas-Morgan
• Accelerated School founder Johnathan Williams

These and additional thought leaders will participate in engaging discussions during the day about the course of education reform and lead a major celebration of reform at night.

“Our guests and speakers embody the pioneering and energetic leadership of the education excellence movement,” Jeanne Allen, Center for Education Reform President, said in a statement. “The examples they have set and the milestones they’ve accomplished are extraordinary. There is no better way to celebrate The Center’s 20th Anniversary than to do so in the company and with the wisdom of those who have set the standard for education reform.”

For more information on CER’s 20th Anniversary Celebration including honorees, other featured presentations, and registration information please visit the 20th Anniversary area of 2024.edreform.com.

True Colors: Celebrating Teachers, Students, and Reform

May 10, 2013

Our PALs in CA, in a lovely email about how much of a difference a great teacher can make in a child’s life, shared John Legend’s rendition of an 80s anthem celebrating Teacher Appreciation Week, calling on our students to celebrate their “true colors.”

Legend is among dozens of past CER EdReformie honorees. As CER turns 20, we’ll be honoring more education reformers at our Conference & Gala on October 9 at the Washington Hilton in Washington, D.C. You don’t want to miss it! Stay tuned here— CER At 20 Conference & Gala registration will be up soon!

Teacher Appreciation: An Open Letter to My Child’s Teacher

Julie Collier, Executive Director of Parents Advocate League, shares her story of why she fights so hard for change in education during teacher appreciation week:

Dear Ms. M.,

As our family takes time during Teacher Appreciation Week to celebrate the teachers that have blessed our children, we are reminded how truly important the profession of teaching is to a child. We focus on the ways their teachers helped them learn and improve with mistakes over the years. We talk about my experience as a student and my 5th grade teacher, Mrs. Shinn, who inspired me to become an educator. My boys love hearing that I used to hate reading and writing back in the day until Mrs. Shinn allowed me to shine in my own way. They also love hearing about my former students and how I taught them, finding inspiration in their accomplishments.

Every year at this time I use this week to focus on the positive. I remind my children how far they have come, and all the great lessons that are still in store for their future. We talk about each grade they have made it through and how their teachers helped them.

This year was different. This was the first year my older son recognized that we never really talk about his first grade year. The year he was in your class. In that moment I allowed myself to be reminded of this painful time for my son and me as a mom and educator. I remembered (like it was yesterday) the very moment you told me he was having difficulty reading, and you suggested we work with him more at home. We did. I remember when you told me he could have dyslexia, and you suggested we have him diagnosed. We took him to his doctor right away who said, “He absolutely does NOT have dyslexia. If I had a dollar for every 1st grade teacher that said a student had this disorder, I could quit my job.”

I choose to leave the profession of teaching, the profession that I love so dearly, in order to focus fully on being a mother to my children. I knew that my duty, both as an educator and mom, was to get to the bottom of why my son was not learning to read. I continued to seek your advice as a fellow educator and the teacher to my son. I believed in you and trusted that you had all the answers. After all, you were the reading specialist at the school, and you have a masters degree in teaching reading.

I knew there was a problem when my son started crying before school. This was completely uncharacteristic and a huge red flag. He said he hated school and wanted to stay home because he didn’t understand it. He said it was too noisy in class. At one point he asked me if he was “special needs” and if so, why didn’t we tell him? My child, your student, felt like a failure in your classroom. Your continued response was to “do more at home.” There was one time when you brought me all your masters’ books and asked me to go through them because you just did not know what else to do.

The moment that I didn’t see coming, finally arrived February of that year, after months of concern and trying to work with you in resolving this together. My desperate worry for my child’s lack of growth in your classroom came to a head. Exasperated I said to you, “We are doing everything at home we possibly can to help,” and asked, “what more can YOU do to help my child?” You crossed your arms and sternly said, “Julie, we have nothing to offer your son.”

My heart felt like it stopped. I knew in that very moment my son was going to have a wasted school year in your class. I also knew you had washed your hands of this “problem.” I don’t remember if I even responded to you or not. I do remember walking away from you feeling such profound disappointment and frustration, yet total resolve to not let my child fail. It was in my hands now, and mine alone.

That day I had to sit my dejected 7 year old child down and tell him, “This is not your fault. Unfortunately, you do not have a great teacher this year, but I am going to do everything I can help make this better for you. There are great teachers out there, and one day you are going to be a great student like you always wanted to be.” As I explained to your student/my son the new learning plan I had for him, I could see a slight glimmer of hope in his eyes.

I found a tutor. I told you that from this point forward, my son was going to do my homework, and not yours. Most importantly, I found my voice. I got loud. I spoke to anyone that would listen about how my son was failing in first grade. Come to find out, there were other children not doing well in your class, either. My son was not alone, and parents that were feeling the same fear for their child as I was, were also no longer alone. In fact, seven of the children in your class were going to parent-paid, after-school tutoring because you had “nothing to offer.”

Your apathy towards my child’s academic achievement ignited a flame in me that continues to burn to this day. It is why I started Parents Advocate League. It is why I continue to speak out at board meetings and education hearings at the state for students and parents. I volunteer my time to help other parents that feel lost in this system because of you and teachers like you. Your apathy is also why I value the profession of teaching more as a parent than I ever understood as a teacher in my own classroom. I get it now.

I can say with confidence and undeniable proof that one bad school year really can have a profound and negative impact on a child. Eventually, my son made progress, but it has been a constant uphill struggle for him. He started feeling more comfortable, and was open to learning new things. He had some great teachers that helped him along the way, and we celebrate them every year at this time. His greatest improvement came in 6th grade when he enrolled in a new charter school. His state test scores went up over 100 points! Most importantly, he developed a love of learning that carries him to this day. His true colors are finally shining through, like I knew they could. I feel like I can honestly say he has finally recovered, and is on the road to achieving his dream of going to the Naval Academy.

So, going back to my son’s question as why we never talk about his first grade year. I explained to him that he had a point. We should talk about that year because of all the years he has been in school, THAT was the year we all learned the most important lesson of our lives: every child deserves a great teacher every, single school year. A great teacher really does make a difference in the life and future of a child.

This Teacher Appreciation Week, I want to recognize you and thank you. Thank you for teaching us such an important life lesson. Thank you for helping me understand that I can make a difference in my children’s education beyond making copies or holding bake sales. Thank you for inspiring me to find my voice, and to encourage other parents to stand up for their own children. Thank you for the unforgettable memory of the moment you gave up on my child. Horrible though it was to hear those words, it empowers me to this day to stay strong in difficult times and reminds me to never give up, because every child deserves a great teacher.

Thank you.

I truly hope you are well and that you learned a lesson from that year too.

Sincerely,

Julie Collier
Executive Director and Founder
Parents Advocate League

I should be curled up in the Fetal position…

May 9, 2013

I should be curled up in the Fetal position…

Diane Ravitch’s blog is full of comments about me and my family… apparently in an attempt to discredit my integrity. Weird. Apparently, I do not understand the constitution or the concept of federalism and need a civics lesson, too. Ugh. My head is moving quickly toward my feet…

Also, I’m married to a man who teaches at a parochial school (Oh my Lord, save me from the fires of hell!) and my own kids went to said school. It must have needed to be said – the suggestion being that I’m married to a radical and none of us like public education. Push me farther into the abyss of fetal centrism. I never realized how bad I was.

But I’m not curled up, at all. In fact, I’m amused. That Diane Ravitch hosts such people on her blog is a mystery, which I will explore in more detail in my book. In fact, I devote almost a whole chapter to Diane and our numerous communications during the 90s that I’ve cherished.

The blog comments noted above are allegedly related to my statement about the Louisiana Supreme Court decision, and my belief that it can and should be appealed to the US Supreme Court. 10th amendment not withstanding, I have good cause to suggest this, and plan to write a bit about it in the near future (though like any good competitive “team” I wont’ be sharing all my secrets – that would be akin to giving the other guys the playbook!). But before I can spend time doing that, I did find it flattering that so many people want to presuppose so much about my personal life that might explain why I who they apparently like to talk about might actually support a child’s civil right to a great education.

I guess at the heart of these comments is that people think something about me personally is interesting… or worth detesting… so they comment. If you want to know something about me, I suppose you should actually ask rather than pre-suppose, however. And about that husband of mine, and those parochially educated kids… let me just brag for a moment:

That husband of mine, Dr. Kevin Strother, is a recognized musician and music-education teacher who grew up attending the public schools of Edenton, NC, where his parents, both public school teachers, were and remain proud members of the North Carolina Education Association. It gets better. Shelby, his mom, is on the board of East Carolina State U, one of the best teacher ed prep schools in the south. Uncle Ken was the superintendent of a nearby town and other members of the Strother clan were school board presidents. Even in their retirement, they care deeply about public education, and bemoan the lagging conditions that leave kids unprepared. We debate what the causes are, but they never question my dedication to solving it.

Back to that husband of mine, he put himself through college, his masters and his PhD – in music AND education – and took a job at a school that allowed him to create the music program from scratch. He actually teaches not in a parochial school but an independent, catholic boys school, where my kids went for some years. I married the music teacher, in fact, and he married me, a widow, with four kids. Thank God for that private school, which supported and nurtured and cared for my boys during a difficult time the way few public schools could have at the time!

My boys actually learned about the Federalist papers in 10th grade, without an AP class. They learned Latin, English literature, about nature, biology, the Greeks, the Romans, the Europeans and yes, Native Americans. They learned about civil rights, the Constitution and the purpose of American government. They all went to college dramatically more knowledgeable about such subjects than most kids in even better public schools. I know. Their professors told me – constantly – and I’ve seen the data. So yes, my choice was a good one – and while anyone who has read my various tomes know I hardly think them perfect, they are also gentlemen – generous, kind and open-minded, having been schooled classically liberal.

My daughter had a similar experience. Throughout their childhood, my kids have toured public schools with me, charter schools, watched and participated in rallies, conferences and read the news – all the time. So when I share this with them, and the Ravitch blog comments, I know they will say what they always say, unprompted…

Mom, “who are these people?? And why do they care where we went to school?”

Patience, my children. Patience.

by Jeanne Allen

Postcards from the Past — No. 2

May 8, 2013

Postcards from the Past 
A new, occasional blog post by CER President Jeanne Allen in commemoration of CER’s 20th Anniversary in business and the historical events that have taken place during our history.

It was January, 1997. It was Pennsylvania. The letter began:

“I recently read with considerable interest your account of the charter school debate in Pennsylvania…I’m not sure who your source was for that account but I thought I’d take the opportunity…to give you the rest of the story…”

The letter was from the president of the PA School Boards Association, Thomas Gentzel, and he was angry that we called the pending proposal in PA a “lousy” charter bill, because it vested all the authority to create charters with school boards. We said at the time, that doing so might make the Blob content, but that it would never lead to charters being created.


Indeed, back then, and even now, school boards associations are more antagonistic about charter school bills that spread the authority for chartering to other entities, like universities, or Mayors, or independent entities completely. The fact is that any division of power for them is a loss of power.

This recently played out again in Mississippi, as it does in every state when charters come up. Republican leaders who wanted desperately to do something about their state’s very weak charter school law admitted that the school board members and superintendents back home were putting heavy pressure on them to limit chartering to only the failing school districts, so that they would not have any schools opening in their districts. On top of that, they opposed multiple authorizers. They always do of course, but retaining sole authority of charter schools to school districts, as PA’s Genztel argued for in 1997, results in exactly the number of charter schools the school boards associations prefer. Zero.

“…the definition of ‘lousy charter bill’,” says Gentzel, “is a matter of taste. The version that passed the House…achieved a notable balance in our opinion: it afforded considerable relief from mandates to charter schools while ensuring that [only] school directors…were empowered to evaluate and act on charter applications.”

In the end, Gov Tom Ridge and his administration held firm and insisted on an appeals process to mitigate what we convinced them would be the effect of having school board only approval of charters. But to this day, the lack of multiple authorizing that was at the heart of that compromise plagues both existing, successful charters from growing as well as would-be schools from opening.

At the same time that effort was ongoing, founder of the L.A.-based Accelerated Charter School, Johnathan Williams, had traveled at our request to Indiana to meet with business leaders and then State Senator Teresa Lubbers who was leading the charge to enact a charter law, an effort that would finally see success some seven years later! Williams, coming from a state in which at the time only school boards could approve charters and even with an appeals process told the group that they should begin with multiple authorizers so as to avoid the hostilities that he had seen throughout his and other’s tenures in Indiana.

They listened and learned and year after year they chose not to adopt a weak law just to have a law and placate the Blob. In 2001, Indiana passed its charter law, with multiple authorizers including the Indianapolis Mayor and Universities, and it was strong, enabling dozens of new, robust schools to see the light of day and grow to serve students most in need.

Kudos to those policymakers who stand firm from the start, and recognize the importance of lessons learned.

Louisiana High Court Violates Parent Rights

Ruling against state voucher program at odds with US Supreme Court Decision in Zelman

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
May 7, 2013

In a clear violation of the civil rights of parents and children, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued an opinion today in a 6-1 decision that the funding method employed in the Louisiana Scholarship Program is unconstitutional.

In the majority opinion, Justice John Weimer wrote in part, “The state funds approved through the unique Minimum Foundation Program process cannot be diverted to nonpublic schools or other nonpublic course providers according to the clear, specific and unambiguous language of the constitution.”

In the majority opinion of the 2002 Supreme Court case Zelman v. Simmons Harris, regarding a similar program in Ohio, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote, “…the Ohio program is neutral in all respects toward religion. It is part of a general and multifaceted undertaking by the State of Ohio to provide educational opportunities to the children of a failed school district.”

Rehnquist continued, “It confers educational assistance directly to a broad class of individuals defined without reference to religion, i.e., any parent of a school-age child who resides in the Cleveland City School District. The program permits the participation of all schools within the district, religious or nonreligious. Adjacent public schools also may participate and have a financial incentive to do so. Program benefits are available to participating families on neutral terms, with no reference to religion. The only preference stated anywhere in the program is a preference for low-income families, who receive greater assistance and are given priority for admission at participating schools.”

The Court determined that when choices were available and parents acted on their ability to privately choose, the Establishment Clause was not implicated.

“If indeed the Louisiana constitution, as suggested by the majority court opinion, prohibits parents from directing the course of the funds allocated to educate their child, then the Louisiana constitution needs to be reviewed by the nation’s highest court,” said Center for Education Reform President Jeanne Allen.

Allen added: “I urge Governor Jindal to file an appeal to the US Supreme Court, and ask for the justices’ immediate review of the decision. The Louisiana justices actions today violate the civil rights of parents and children who above all are entitled to an education that our Founders repeated time and time again is the key to a free, productive democracy.”

Louisiana State Superintendent John White briefly commented today that while he had not yet read the opinion (he was on Capitol Hill today testifying on federal programs), he understands the ruling to say, “it’s not that the program itself is unconstitutional, but that the funding needs to come from somewhere else.”

White added that, “we will find funding and keep fighting this.”

For more information on this and related school choice programs visit the CER school choice FAQs page, as well as the Black Alliance for Educational Options (BAEO) and the Institute for Justice.

Newswire: May 7, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 18
SPECIAL EDITION, from the Editor
WHY NATIONAL CHARTER SCHOOLS WEEK IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE

(excerpted. Read the Full Analysis here)

“People seldom improve when they have no other model but themselves to copy after.”
–Oliver Goldsmith

This quote seems particularly apt today, the second day of National Charter Schools Week, a time to reflect on as well as celebrate the milestones made when this simple concept was created by thoughtful people in the late 1980s.

The birth of the first charter law in Minnesota in 1991 ushered in a major, bi-partisan movement. The first school, City Academy High School in St. Paul was what it was all about – teacher driven, with parents highly empowered and curriculum tailored to the interests and needs of students. TIME Magazine would, a few years later, call it a “Grassroots Revolt.” And so it was. Organic, interesting innovations in teaching and learning began to be developed in application after application, school after school. Innovations in authorizing were similarly adopted, with laws suddenly empowering universities, mayors, and city councils to step up to the plate and engage in creating the “new public school.”

Some 22 years, 6,200 schools, 2.5 million students and 6 million adults involved later, there are many more policies and laws than ever dreamed, and a rigorous push for more and better schools daily, demanded largely by the people who led the battle to start – frustrated teachers and parents who know that they and their children can do better if given a choice.

Yet too often, those involved lose sight of that original goal and spend time advancing bad ideas that have no connection to the original concept. So it was that Tuesday’s Thought from Oliver Goldsmith which struck me as particularly apt today. “People seldom improve when they have no other model but themselves to copy after.” It happens to the best of us, the best movements. In the charter school world today, it’s happening, period:

  • With an authorizer group that believes its model for authorizing is the only one, despite evidence to the contrary and examples of disconnect with the very people authorizers are intended to support and serve;
  • With charter school networks, which believe that their way of educating is the best and only way, to the detriment of the small, independent groups who know their communities and families best and work hard to serve them outside of the public eye, yet fail to garner the public attention that the more well-funded among us get;
  • With policymakers who believe in charter schools but keep putting their names on bills that empower more government involvement, and disempower the people running the schools;
  • With organizations, who limit their visions and often focus on turf over substance;
  • With funders who fail to question – have I become blinded by one model, one group, one approach?
  • With all of us who assume that it’s someone else’s job to fight these fights and challenge their friends to do better.

 

And yet, despite all of these internal deficiencies the reform eco-system has, thousands of great stories of student and educator success are evident. These three stand out, today:

At Archimedean Upper Conservatory Charter School, FL, the first two graduating classes (Class of 2012 & 2013) have had tremendous success with college placement. Of a combined total of 65 students of the first two graduating classes, 97% have been admitted to 4-year colleges and universities, roughly 60% have been admitted to Top-100 colleges and universities and about 15-20% have been admitted to Top-20 colleges and universities including Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Williams, Amherst, Stanford, MIT, Pomona, Brown, Duke, West Point, Vanderbilt, Emory, and more. Although Archimedean Upper Conservatory has been in existence only since 2008, it boasts several successes in academic competitions including: National VEX Robotics Silver Medals (2011 & 2012), National Science Olympiad (2012), National History Bowl & Bee (2011, 2012, 2013), National Ocean Sciences Bowl (2013), National Academic Championship (2013), State Science Olympiad Silver Medalist (2011 & 2012), State Science Olympiad Bronze Medalist (2013), Miami-Dade District Geography Bee Champions (2011 & 2012), and more.

At Boys Latin Charter School, Philadelphia – the only public school in town to take the National Latin Exam – students have increased their medal count each year and actually doubled last years total. They compete in Certamen, a “college bowl” competition for HS Latin students, competed at Yale and most recently at Holy Cross, where the Boys Latin young men placed third (against competitors from toney New England private schools). College enrollment percentages beat any ethnic or gender rates in the district, including Asian girls. The first two graduating classes had college enrollment rates of 74% and 81% respectively, mostly in 4-year institutions. There does not appear to be another public HS in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania graduating more than 25% African-American males who can beat that performance. Because it is an all-boys school it thrives on competitive outlets.

Evergreen Community Charter School in Asheville, NC is recognized for its environmental mission as well as its academics. It’s been a Designated Honor School of Excellence for two consecutive years and received the U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Award for being a school that exercises a comprehensive approach to creating “green” environments through reducing environmental impact, promoting health, and ensuring a high-quality environmental and outdoor education to prepare students with the 21st century skills and sustainability concepts needed in the growing global economy (2012). The school’s Middle school science teacher, Stuart Miles, won North Carolina’s Charter School Teacher of the Year (2010-11). Evergreen received the Exceptional Environmental Education Center award from the Environmental Educators of North Carolina (2010) and was approved for charter renewal for 10 years and full SACS CASI accreditation through AdvancED, an organization that advances excellence in education worldwide (2009).

Great Valley Academy in Manteca, California demonstrates the power of the “Ripple Effect.” In its first year the API score was 800, without test prep. Its kids include high numbers of children with dyslexia, ADD and Autism, yet their students are able to function without academic deficiencies. Great Valley ensures that not only does every child succeed academically, but every class learns to run a business. And there’s still time to be a model for physical fitness and instill strong character in its students. In a short period of time they have been so successful that the traditional school district signed a contract with its leaders to implement the program in their schools and they are beginning to work with a county school to do the same.

These are but a few models that exist. Visit these charter schools — and others — TODAY by going to their websites at the Center’s Online Directory, and get involved, become outspoken and ALWAYS seek to improve (without asking government to impose additional restrictions and bureaucracy to get there!)

For more ways to improve what you do in the charter school eco-system, check out the ideas and tools listed in the full analysis.

Why Charter Schools Week Is An Opportunity To Improve

Newswire: Tuesday May 7, 2013
SPECIAL EDITION
WHY NATIONAL CHARTER SCHOOLS WEEK IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE

by Jeanne Allen

“People seldom improve when they have no other model but themselves to copy after.”
–Oliver Goldsmith

(‘In other words, self-reflection is essential but seeing others exhibit characteristics or actions that are worth learning from is also helpful. It offers perspective and examples of successful practice.’ From Rick Larios, a veteran education reformer who cut his teeth at Edison Learning, I receive a special “thought” every day that almost always inspires.)

This particular quote seems particularly apt today, the second day of National Charter Schools Week, a time to reflect on as well as celebrate the milestones made when this simple concept was created by thoughtful people in the late 1980s.

The birth of the first charter law in Minnesota in 1991 ushered in a major, bi-partisan movement. The first school, City Academy High School in St. Paul was what it was all about – teacher driven, with parents highly empowered and curriculum tailored to the interests and needs of students. TIME Magazine would, a few years later, call it a “Grassroots Revolt.” And so it was. Organic, interesting innovations in teaching and learning began to be developed in application after application, school after school. Innovations in authorizing were similarly adopted, with laws suddenly empowering universities, mayors, and city councils to step up to the plate and engage in creating the “new public school.”

Some 22 years, 6,200 schools, 2.5 million students and 6 million adults involved later, there are many more policies and laws than ever dreamed, and a rigorous push for more and better schools daily, demanded largely by the people who led the battle to start – frustrated teachers and parents who know that they and their children can do better if given a choice.

Yet too often, those involved lose sight of that original goal and spend time advancing bad ideas that have no connection to the original concept. So it was that Tuesday’s Thought from Oliver Goldsmith which struck me as particularly apt today. “People seldom improve when they have no other model but themselves to copy after.” It happens to the best of us, the best movements. In the charter school world today, it’s happening, period:

  • With an authorizer group that believes its model for authorizing is the only one, despite evidence to the contrary and examples of disconnect with the very people authorizers are intended to support and serve;
  • With charter school networks, which believe that their way of educating is the best and only way, to the detriment of the small, independent groups who know their communities and families best and work hard to serve them outside of the public eye, yet fail to garner the public attention that the more well-funded among us get;
  • With policymakers who believe in charter schools but keep putting their names on bills that empower more government involvement, and disempower the people running the schools;
  • With organizations, who limit their visions and often focus on turf over substance;
  • With funders who fail to question – have I become blinded by one model, one group, one approach?
  • With all of us who assume that it’s someone else’s job to fight these fights and challenge their friends to do better.

And yet, despite all of these internal deficiencies the reform eco-system has, where thousands of great stories of student and educator success are evident, day after day, in the nation’s cities and towns, and blissfully ignorant of the grasstops battles that are waged over policies to help them maintain and advance their most precious commodities, our kids. To wit:

At Archimedean Upper Conservatory Charter School, FL, the first two graduating classes (Class of 2012 & 2013) have had tremendous success with college placement. Of a combined total of 65 students of the first two graduating classes, 97% have been admitted to 4-year colleges and universities, roughly 60% have been admitted to Top-100 colleges and universities and about 15-20% have been admitted to Top-20 colleges and universities including Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Williams, Amherst, Stanford, MIT, Pomona, Brown, Duke, West Point, Vanderbilt, Emory, and more. Archimedean Upper Conservatory although has been in existence only since 2008 has several successes in academic competitions including: National VEX Robotics Silver Medals (2011 & 2012), National Science Olympiad (2012), National History Bowl & Bee (2011, 2012, 2013), National Ocean Sciences Bowl (2013), National Academic Championship (2013), State Science Olympiad Silver Medalist (2011 & 2012), State Science Olympiad Bronze Medalist (2013), Miami-Dade District Geography Bee Champions (2011 & 2012), and more.

At Boys Latin Charter School, Philadelphia – the only public school in town to take the National Latin Exam – students have increased their medal count each year and actually doubled last years total. They compete in Certamen, a “college bowl” competition for HS Latin students, competed at Yale and most recently at Holy Cross, where the Boys Latin young men placed third (against competitors from toney New England private schools). College enrollment percentages beat any ethnic or gender rates in the District, including Asian girls. The first two graduating classes had college enrollment rates of 74% and 81% respectively, mostly in 4-year institutions. There does not appear to be another public HS in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania graduating more than 25% African-American males who can beat that performance. Because it is an all-boys school it thrives on competitive outlets.

Evergreen Community Charter School in Asheville, NC is recognized for its environmental mission as well as its academics. It’s been a Designated Honor School of Excellence for two consecutive years and received the U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Award for being a school that exercises a comprehensive approach to creating “green” environments through reducing environmental impact, promoting health, and ensuring a high-quality environmental and outdoor education to prepare students with the 21st century skills and sustainability concepts needed in the growing global economy (2012). The school’s Middle school science teacher, Stuart Miles, won North Carolina’s Charter School Teacher of the Year (2010-11). Evergreen received the Exceptional Environmental Education Center award from the Environmental Educators of North Carolina (2010) and was approved for charter renewal for 10 years and full SACS CASI accreditation through AdvancED, an organization that advances excellence in education worldwide (2009).

Great Valley Academy in Manteca, California demonstrates the power of the “Ripple Effect.” In its first year the API score was 800, without test prep. Its kids include high numbers of children with dyslexia, ADD and Autism, yet their students are able to function without academic deficiencies. Great Valley ensures that not only does every child succeed academically, but every class learns to run a business. And there’s still time to be a model for physical fitness and instill strong character in its students. In a short period of time they have been so successful that the traditional school district signed a contract with its leaders to implement the program in their schools and they are beginning to work with a county school to do the same.

These are but a few models that exist. Visit these charter schools — and others — TODAY by going to their websites at the Center’s Online Directory, and get involved, become outspoken and ALWAYS seek to improve (without asking government to impose additional restrictions and bureaucracy to get there!)

For more ways to improve what you do in the charter school eco-system, check out these ideas and tools:

The Essential Guide to Charter School Lawmaking: Model Legislation for States
 – CER has developed a roadmap for policymakers and advocates that focuses on essential elements of charter school law: Independent and Multiple Authorizers, Number of Schools Allowed, Operations, and Quality. This framework is based on 20 years of experience working with charter school leaders, policymakers, and legal experts, and reflects what actually works – and what doesn’t – when it comes to ensuring sound charter school policy.

The Parent Power Index (PPI) measures the ability in each state of a parent to exercise choices – no matter what their income or child’s level of academic achievement – engage with their local school and board, and have a voice in the systems that surround their child. The Parent Power Index gives parents an interactive tool to discover whether the state affords them power –and if not, what they can do to get it.

Start a Charter School Today! Use CER’s step-by-step toolkit to help you through the process of establishing a charter school.