Sign up for our newsletter

Being poor doesn’t mean you’re a poor parent

A fantastic opinion piece by education reform pioneer T. Willard Fair appeared on Tallahassee.com on April 19, 2013:

There has long been a troubling attitude in our society about low-income parents.

Put bluntly, it goes like this: Poor people make poor parents.

Of course, folks in proper circles usually don’t come right out and say it, which is what made the recent comments by state Sen. David Simmons, R-Altamonte Springs, so stunning.

When asked by the media about the parent empowerment bill (Senate Bill 862, House Bill 867), Sen. Simmons responded:

“Let’s face it, the parents are the very people who haven’t been involved in their own children’s lives so as to cause the school to improve. What kind of credibility do you give to the parents in those kinds of circumstances?”

Everybody knows who he is talking about, because the bill is meant to address consistently failing schools in low-income neighborhoods.

Forget about the historic neglect of these schools.

Forget that school districts and unions have used them as out-of-sight, out-of-mind depositories for ineffective personnel.

Forget about the long history of promoting illiterate children to certain failure just to move them through the system.

Forget that many of these parents are working two minimum-wage jobs to support their children and don’t have time to form a PTA or lobby in Tallahassee.

It’s all the parents’ fault. Let’s face it.

If a school fails year after year, the judgment of those running the school should not be challenged by the parents of the children the school is failing.

The people responsible for the failure are competent, but the parents are not.

They can’t be trusted with decisions about changing school management, because they will get bamboozled into turning their school over to some nefarious profiteer. And during the process, they will squabble among themselves and create discord in the community.

So take away their power to act, and reduce them to hoping that this next time around those who have consistently failed their children will somehow get their acts together. If they don’t, then so be it. If the unions block the removal of ineffective teachers, so be it.

After all, it’s the parents’ fault. Let’s face it.

Maybe I would expect this out of union leaders, politicians beholden to their campaign contributions, education bureaucracies and parents who send their children to high-performing schools and see only that side of public education. But it disturbs me to see black legislators tacitly give their approval through their silence and their votes.

I have devoted the past 25 years to ensuring that poor minority children have access to an equal education. In this effort, I do not pledge allegiance to traditional public schools, charter schools or voucher schools.

I don’t care about the vehicle. I care about the result. And I’ve found the result is much better when parents are allowed to make choices.

Those vested in the current system attack choice. They throw out buzz words such as “privatizing education” or “corporate reformers” or “destroying public education.”

But this is what they don’t want people to know: The reason there are a growing number of charter schools, the reason for the long waiting lists, the reason why vouchers are so coveted, is because parents want them. And of course, the only intellectually honest rebuttal to that demand is that these parents don’t know what is best for their children.

Now if parents make a six-figure paycheck and can buy school choice, that is an entirely different matter.

I certainly found Sen. Simmons’ comments to be distasteful. But I do give him credit for at least having the courage and honesty to say out loud what many in the Legislature appear to be privately thinking.

T. Willard Fair is a former chairman of the Florida State Board of Education, the president and chief executive officer of the Urban League of Greater Miami Inc., and a member of the Foundation for Florida’s Future Board of Directors.

Expert: Legislature’s contentment with status quo hinders student success

By Kathryn Watson
Watchdog.org Virginia Bureau
April 23, 2013

A culture of complacency is keeping Virginia from furthering student success, one educational expert says.

Virginia parents are practically powerless in determining the course of their children’s education, and student success is urgently low.

If, that is, Virginia’s fall this month to 39th nationally in the Center for Education Reform’s Parent Power Index and eighth-grade reading proficiency of less than 36 percent mean anything.

But contentment with the status quo within the Virginia General Assembly perpetuates those failures, said Kara Kerwin, vice president of external affairs for the D.C.-based nonprofit Center for Education Reform.

Virginia scores well on some national reports, such as the 2012 national report card by Education Week, which ranked Old Dominion schools fourth in the nation. But instead of relying on results such as reading proficiency, lawmakers look to reports like Education Week’s, which rely heavily on investments rather than outcomes to say Virginia schools are A-OK, Kerwin said.

“Really, the Legislature just failed to act on anything because they just said, ‘We’re fine, we’re number four.’”

That’s about what Delegate Bob Tata, retiring from the General Assembly after 30 years and thus, from his post as House Education Committee chair, told Watchdog.org.

“We have a pretty decent school system. One survey has us ranked fourth in the country,” Tata said.

But Kerwin said something is clearly awry when only one-third of eighth graders master reading proficiency.

CER’s Parent Power Index grades states on how much freedom they afford parents in the categories of school choice, charter schools, online learning, teacher quality and transparency. Virginia was ranked 35th in January of this year, but other states’ improvements have laid bare Old Dominion stagnation.

“Other states might have improved. Virginia hasn’t done anything,” Kerwin said.

The Virginia Association of School Boards did not return a request for comment on the Parent Power Index.

Virginia — with some of the strictest charter school laws in the nation and just four charter schools to serve the commonwealth’s 1.3 million K-12 students — almost automatically earns a poor ranking from CER, Kerwin said.

Parents’ ability to choose, Kerwin said, is one of the most important factors in student success.

“When parents can vote with their feet … we see all schools improve,” Kerwin said. “Without the power to make choices, parent involvement is meaningless.”

But, Tata said, parents’ ability to determine the course of their children’s educations isn’t the most crucial factor in academic success.

“Like everything else, it depends pretty much on money and where you live,” Tata said. “If you live in Fairfax County, I’d imagine the schools are pretty much excellent. … I think you could probably trace the education system pretty close to the dollar average that the parents make.”

But is it fair for a student’s relative success to depend on parental wealth and how much those parents are willing to pay in property taxes?

“Life is not fair,” Tata said. “I guess that’s a start. People are willing to pay more taxes in those areas,” like Fairfax County, he said.

But Kerwin said that line of thought is perpetuated by reports, like Education Week’s, which tend to rely on investments over results.

“It’s really based on inputs not outputs,” Kerwin said. “Virginia spends a lot of money — for what?”

Kerwin said case studies shatter the perception that more money directly translates to better schools.

“It’s not about how much money,” Kerwin said.

A study of Tennessee’s schools by the University of Memphis, published March 2012, concluded, “This research revealed that per pupil expenditure did not have a significant relationship to ACT scores or to the TCAP (Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program) writing assessment scores. An implication is that giving schools more money does not necessarily raise student achievement, but rather how the money is spent can raise student achievement.”

And University of Arkansas researchers in a yet-to-be-released report commissioned by the Walton Family Foundation found that District of Columbia Public Schools, which make up more than 40 percent of the District’s schools, receive 46 percent less funding than the District’s public schools.

What does make for effective schools, Kerwin argued, is parents’ ability to choose.

“What’s interesting about that though is that charter schools in the district are completely outperforming DCPS schools,” Kerwin said. “And it’s not about money. It’s about giving choice for quality schools.”

A Nation At Risk — 30 Years Later

A NATION AT RISK NO MORE – BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY
a manifesto by CER President Jeanne Allen

April 26, 2013 marks the 30 year anniversary of one of the education reform movement’s most influential reports, A Nation At Risk. With an unprecedented urgency, the 1983 report called for Americans to reverse the course of a crumbling U.S. education system plagued by “a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people. If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.”

Now, thirty years after this grave warning, we still have an education system where students graduate without even basic literacy skills. So where do we go from here?

The commission that wrote A Nation At Risk believed our educational woes could be solved if the “people of our country, together
with those who have public responsibility in the matter, care enough and are courageous enough to do what is required.” Education reform has become a commonplace term in American society, but what’s needed is for it to become a commonplace action. Let’s take action and answer this wake-up call poised to us in A Nation At Risk by vowing to no longer accept mediocrity in our schools, and together we can accelerate the pace of education reform.

In the News

‘Nation at Risk’ warnings about shortcomings in US education 30 years ago still resonate today
Washington Post, April 24, 2013

Quotables

“If there’s a bottom line, it’s that we’re spending twice as much money on education as we did in ‘83 and the results haven’t changed all that much.” —William Bennett

It Could Have Been My Boy

Founder and President of the Center for Education Reform reflects on the Boston tragedy in a Huffington Post piece:

The events of recent months tell us we must all do that, no matter how incorrect the social scientists believe such behavior to be. Every mother must ask herself — do I really know my child? Do I understand how he spends his time, what he needs, whether he is masking some hidden hurt? Do I know what the cause of his joy or sorrow is? Can I impact him now at 16, 18, or even 25? Am I willing to intervene to protect the other people around me, regardless of whether he’s my son or not? Mothers must take charge of the chaos our boys are creating around us.

Read the whole story here.

Funding Inequality for Students in Nation’s Capital

Report Emphasizes Persistent Funding Gap for D.C. Charter School Students

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
April 23, 2013

Students attending public charter schools in the nation’s capital are funded at almost 44 percent less than students in the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) according to a recent report by the University of Arkansas.

The study, “Education’s Fiscal Cliff, Real or Perceived?” by leading researcher Larry Maloney, compares funding at traditional public schools to charter schools between 2007-2011. The data reveal a significant and persistent gap in per pupil funding for charter schools from federal, state and local sources.

The Center for Education Reform’s Annual Survey of America’s Charter Schools has found the same results since the 1998-1999 Academic Year. Most recent data prove that on average nationally, charter schools are funded at 68 percent of their traditional district public school counterparts. This figure does not include the capital funds for facilities that charters do not receive either.

“With 43 percent of DC’s students in these innovative public schools, demonstrating overwhelmingly better academic achievement, you’d think the nation’s leaders would demand equity,” said Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform. “Instead these students, whose families chose to find a better alternative, are being penalized for seeking the American dream for their children.”

University of Arkansas looked at four other of the nation’s largest school districts -Newark, Milwaukee, Denver and Los Angeles – and found widespread inequity across the board. Their final report is expected to be released in the spring of 2014.

Newswire: April 23, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 16

BING. Two significant developments in the cause for equity and justice for kids happened over the past few days. First, a major report by the non-partisan University of Arkansas found that students in Washington, DC charter schools are treated to almost 44% less in funding than the traditional public school system receives. We’ve known this, of course, and have reported on it numerous times. Indeed the funding gap between charters and traditional public schools averages 30-40% nationwide, and that’s before you count the lack of facilities funds! With 43% of DC’s students in these innovative public schools, and overwhelmingly better academic achievement, you’d think the nation’s leaders would demand equity so that these students, whose families chose to find a better alternative to the traditional public schools, would not be penalized for seeking the American dream for their children.

BANG. Then comes the revelation (not to most of us toiling in the ed-reform vineyards for years) that African-American students benefit the most from school choice, as evidenced by their progress in college. The report by Harvard’s Paul Peterson says that African-American students in NYC who used the voucher to attend private schools are 24% more likely to go to college.

BOOM. Idaho Governor Butch Otter was not happy with the outcome of last fall’s ballot initiatives, which the union led to repeal his signature school improvement laws that would have paid teachers based on performance, phased out tenure, limited collective-bargaining, and expanded online learning opportunities. As a strong governor does, he worked with the legislature to revisit the issues and a new package was introduced and passed this week that requires a majority of teachers in support to open negotiations, limits teacher negotiations to one year and permits districts to address pay in emergency situations, two things not permitted under traditional collective bargaining contracts.

MUSIC TO OUR EARS. From the latest issue of Philanthropy Magazine comes tales of accomplishment from amidst the philanthropic community; a profile of the man who led Florida to bolster choices for tens of thousands of needy families; the story of where advocacy efforts first started (though some, like ours, were inadvertently left out of the narrative!); an introduction to a real users guide for Blended learning, insights into the thinking of major reform philanthropists and thoughts about what we are still missing from the funding spectrum. Engaging, thoughtful analysis, all of it, to be sure.

CORE-CONSPIRACY? A funny, tongue-in-cheek blog takes aim at those who believe that the Common Core State Standards are part of a vast government/corporate conspiracy to get into our children’s brains and dumb down America. Some of us have been doing this a long time and never ever seen an education conspiracy by left or right, other than the often unintentional but thoughtless conspiracy by the Education Blob to prevent school choice, accountability, and teacher quality measures to happen and bad schools to close. Those are conspiracies of long-seeded alliances, who think and act the same way because their power structure gave them the right to do so. One need not be a cynic to recognize how education has fallen apart under the “careful” hands of governments over the years. But that’s a side issue. The real important questions being raised in very intelligent and thoughtful circles are whether Common Core will have any effect on our schools, given that those who don’t like high standards to start — or consequences for failing to meet them — remain in charge of the very large education cartel that we have in this country. And if they result in everyone changing the materials they use but no one really rigorously following them, will we have wasted time and money that could have been spent on, let’s say, more flexibility for teachers in the classroom, teacher quality initiatives and school choice? Time will tell whether that — or infinitely low cut scores — will be the demise of the Common Core. It’s not a panacea, after all, and often the best-intentioned efforts are doomed in this system.

WE’RE HAVING A PARTY. Plan to join us for CER’s 20th Anniversary Conference and Gala Celebration in Washington, DC, October 9th. The conference theme, EDUCATION REFORM: BEFORE IT WAS COOL, will reintroduce to most and introduce to many the china-breakers and their efforts that paved the way for the cool kids of today. You won’t want to miss it. Details at https://2024.edreform.com/about/20th-anniversary/.

Postcards from the Past — No. 1

April 22, 2013

Postcards from the Past 
A new, occasional blog post by CER President Jeanne Allen in commemoration of CER’s 20th Anniversary in business and the historical events that have taken place during our history.

Ohio, 1994

So many people start a sentence with “it seems like yesterday,” but you know, that phrase has never tired me. When history is so critical to who we are individually or collectively, what has happened before is almost always interesting. I think that’s particularly so today for education reformers, who just a short time ago launched a movement that has shattered myths, broken down conventional barriers to real education for children, and upset an establishment that continues to plague our schools.

“It seems like yesterday…” that I got this letter, and went to work to help State Senator Cooper Snyder eventually succeed with his legislation authorizing a pilot school choice program for poor children in Cleveland, eg, vouchers. It was a bill which eventually got through the entire legislature, was litigated all the way to the US Supreme Court and affirmed the constitutionality of vouchers and most important, the parents’ right to direct the flow of dollars allocated to educate their child.

The outcry from The Blob was, as expected, fierce and negative.

Today, more opportunities are opened up to children thanks to a few people like Senator Snyder, who is now retired and keeps up with us on the day’s trends. We owe this pioneer of school choice a great deal of gratitude — and the critical recognition that too many of us forget to give — for fighting the early battles so we could all benefit.

I hope you’ve enjoyed this first Postcard from the Past!

Financial Literacy: Part of the Fabric of What We Teach

by Jeanne Allen
response to “What Is Financial Literacy?”, National Journal
April 22, 2013

I don’t remember anyone explicitly teaching me financial literacy, but ever since I was a working teenager, I’ve known how to manage my money and what it means to have debt, to pay interest, and the basics. Part of that was because my parents were small business people (I guess) but also part of it was because my peers were similarly inclined. I remember one high school math teacher talking about saving and I certainly remember when I had to get student loans and read the info that I was given. Later, I just knew I had to pay my bills.

Yet no one in high school ever really touched the subject of the economy, and the idea of capitalism was simply a footnote in the textbooks. Most people today don’t understand how business works, which is the primary reason that everyone assumes when enterprises fail it must be because of greed. There is more written about the evils of business than discussing what commerce really is, so if we’re not actually being factual and honest about how money flows and why it’s important, I’m not sure we can expect anything other than financial illiteracy. This isn’t a job, however, for a dedicated course, but should be part of the fabric of what we teach and how we teach everything from history to government to economics to basic math! Consider that even when we talk about businesses managing schools today, the entire education establishment protests, as if doing such a thing were not a natural or important part of the general fabric of our basic economic foundation.

Ironically, the same president who has been highly critical of American business and whose administration is working hard to banish for-profit education companies has declared April to be Financial Literacy Month. We should perhaps begin with first things — teaching our young people from their earliest years with content that recognizes the important of American commerce, business models, currency and how people’s monetary habits —- or dependence on it — can either aid or harm the economy.

The student loan crisis isn’t about financial illiteracy. It’s about the corresponding values we as a society place on debt, and right now, our leaders aren’t exactly role models on that score. Solve the education problem, teach students about their nation’s founding, its economic model and what we should and shouldn’t expect government to do for us, and you achieve financial literacy. And maybe you get people who start voting for people who don’t expect debt to manage the economy, too.

Mississippi Governor Signs Charter Schools Act

‘New era’: Governor signs education reforms, including charter schools, into law
by Jimmie E. Gates
Clarion Ledger
April 18, 2013

Education reform measures signed into law by Gov. Phil Bryant constitute real progress, business leader and education advocate Jim Barksdale said.

“Follow-through in future years — which will require funding — and faithful implementation are critical,” Barksdale said.

On Wednesday, in front of hundreds at Northwest Rankin High School, once attended by his two children, Bryant signed into law most of his education reform package including charter schools. He touted it as the most significant education package in the history of Mississippi.

“It is transformative. … It will begin a new era for education in Mississippi,” Bryant said. “The changes enacted by this legislation will help the state create and retain the best teachers, create public charter schools of excellence that will give our students in failing schools access to higher education, and create reading practices that will stop the exercise of social promotion.”

Kevin Gilbert, president of the Mississippi Association of Educators, said he’s generally taking a wait-and-see approach — that is, will the provisions do what supporters say they will do and will adequate resources be provided for implementation.

Bryant lauded Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves, House Speaker Philip Gunn and other legislative leaders instrumental in getting the legislation passed.

“The goal we all share is that every child will have an opportunity for success,” Reeves said.

The legislation passed allows up to 15 charter schools a year to start in low-performing, D- and F-rated districts, without local school board approval. Local districts would have veto power over them in A, B and C districts. Reeves and others wanted only A and B districts to have veto power and other more expansive measures, but the House, with only a slim Republican majority and some GOP opposition, couldn’t pass the more expansive legislation.

Reeves believes, once charter schools prove themselves, there will be a push for their presence beyond failing districts.

The Legislature also passed the Literacy Based Promotion Act, designed to prevent the social promotion of children from third to fourth grade if they can’t read proficiently. They would receive “intensive intervention” to help with their reading.

Lawmakers approved $9.5 million to start the program, which was part of Bryant’s “Education Works” agenda, modeled after Florida’s education reforms.

Lawmakers also passed a pilot merit pay system for teachers, a pilot state pre-kindergarten program supporters hope can be expanded and regulations that would require districts with graduation rates lower than 80 percent to institute improvement plans. Education Works also included creating 200 scholarships for students with a 3.5 grade point average and 28 ACT score who commit to teaching in a Mississippi public school for five years.

A strong early education program will be critical to increasing reading scores and for children to be better thinkers, said Cathy Grace, a veteran early childhood educator.

“It has been 30 years since the state last took the next step in needed education reform,” Grace said, and “let’s hope it doesn’t take that long next time.”

But some public education advocates and lawmakers say one thing the Legislature didn’t do with education this year was “fully fund” it. Although K-12’s $2.3 billion budget includes an increase of nearly $50 million, more than half of that was for retirement system cost increases, and it leaves the Mississippi Adequate Education Program funding formula nearly $300 million short.

Who Owns Our Children?

Dear Friend,

For too long, the usual suspects have played the blame game trying to convince us that it’s the system’s fault, or that it takes a village to raise a child.

But as a mother of four children, I know that’s baloney. It’s parents who know what’s best for our kids. And, for too long, education policy in this country has failed to reflect that simple truth.

At The Center for Education Reform (CER), we know that parents are a child’s first teacher.

As policymakers and educators nationwide are clamoring for more parental involvement (knowing that it will positively impact student learning), CER has its ear to the ground across the states- listening to parents, hearing their woes, and realizing how important it is that they have the knowledge they need at their fingertips. We know that without real power, parent involvement is meaningless.

Thanks to help from supporters like you, CER created the Parent Power Index© (PPI), the first and only comprehensive evaluation of state education policy geared towards parents.  PPI is:

· An integrated, user-friendly, state-by-state index of how many quality choices are available to parents

· Continuously updated in real-time with new data and information about how states compare to one another; with once a quarter- comprehensive state ranking updates

· Geared towards parents but utilized by citizens, media, lawmakers, and more

Last week, we released our latest ranking & scorecard, providing a refreshed arsenal of state and local resources. Check out how your state fares here.

As we gear up for tough fights ahead, and as others try to discredit our findings, your support is more critical than ever before.

Will you consider supporting CER today with a gift of $75, $100, or even $250 to help us continue beating the drum for public policy reforms and guiding grassroots activism by showing parents they have power?

Because, as it turns out, parents really do know what’s best for our kids—and the more they’re allowed to have a voice in their children’s education, the more they learn, and the better off they are as adults.

Don’t you agree? 

Best Regards,

Jeanne Allen
President

P.S.  Thank you for supporting CER. Your donation today supports CER’s mission to make sure all kids have access to a quality education, and helps us empower parents to have a greater voice.