Sign up for our newsletter

McDonnell achieves mixed results in trying to reform Virginia’s schools

by Michael Alison Chandler and Fredrick Kunkle
Washington Post
March 10, 2013

Robert F. McDonnell ran for Virginia governor promising to reform public schools by offering parents more accountability and better teachers and giving them greater school choice by growing the state’s tiny list of charter schools.

In his final push in the General Assembly this year, McDonnell (R) backed successful bills to bring Teach for America to Virginia, give grades to schools using A through F report cards, fine-tune a voucher-like program to help poor students attend private schools and institute a state board that would take over chronically underperforming schools.

But on some signature issues, he fell short of his promise to transform public education, reformers said. His initial attempt to make it easier to fire teachers was defeated, and his plan for performance-based pay was only partially funded. Statewide, there still are only four charter schools.

His overall record has alarmed many of Virginia’s Democratic lawmakers and educators, who say a shift toward private alternatives could undermine the state’s public schools. But nationally, reform activists say they are frustrated that despite an explosion of education innovations during the past four years, Virginia still lags behind other states.

Jeanne Allen, president of the Washington-based Center for Education Reform, called Virginia “a black mark for the movement” and McDonnell’s leadership “extremely disappointing.”

But the governor’s calls for change seemed misplaced to many Virginians, who are proud of their school systems, their early adoption of rigorous academic standards and their high national rankings. Education Week placed Virginia No. 4 in the nation this year for its overall student achievement and education policies — an accolade often cited in Richmond. Some argued that what the schools need are more resources to better achieve standards already in place; Virginia ranks 38th in the country for its share of per-pupil funding.

“When you have the fourth-ranked education state, it’s an uphill battle to educate folks on something completely different,” said Javaid Siddiqi, Virginia’s deputy secretary for education. “But there is a significantly different conversation happening around charter schools and [public education] than there was” four years ago.

The lack of urgency is fueled by nationally renowned suburban school systems that largely foot the bill for local schools and “do not like being challenged” as well as an overall climate where people “want to focus on things that are going well,” said Andrew Rotherham, an education consultant and former member of the state Board of Education.

Less often noted are trouble spots. Only one in five African American eighth-graders, for example, scored proficient or better on a national mathematics test.

McDonnell’s administration ran counter to reformers early in the governor’s term. The federal government’s 2010 Race to the Top competition sent dozens of states scrambling to adopt national academic standards or education policies that link teacher evaluations to test scores.

The governor was initially enthusiastic about the president’s reform agenda, but after Virginia came in 31st out of 41 states in the first round, he pulled out of the running, citing excessive “federal mandates” and state standards that were “much superior” to proposed national standards.

McDonnell struggled early on to gain traction with his plan to expand charter schools. He proposed giving the state Board of Education authority to approve charter applications, shifting that exclusive power from local school boards, which historically have been unreceptive.

The proposal failed, as did efforts to amend the state constitution to make it easier for other governing bodies to oversee local schools.

Instead, Virginia created an advisory committee on the state board to offer an initial technical review of charter applications and a chance to strengthen them before local school boards cast the final vote.

Siddiqi said the administration had to overcome confusion and misinformation among school leaders about what publicly funded charter schools are and how they might be helpful.

“That mountain was one we did not fully appreciate or anticipate,” he said.

As a result, state Education Secretary Laura Fornash said, the administration has worked to promote school choice in different ways.

McDonnell made way for virtual schools to grow in Virginia by allowing public schools to contract for online programs and pushing a requirement that all high school graduates take at least one online course.

In 2012, the General Assembly also approved a voucher-like program, modeled after similar efforts in Florida and Pennsylvania, that would give tax breaks to businesses and individuals to help fund private school tuition for poor children.

The plan to use tax money for private schools was hotly contested by teachers unions and many Democratic lawmakers.

Also controversial was McDonnell’s plan to create a state-level board that would take over persistently low-performing schools. The “school board in the sky,” as opponents called it, could hand over management to a charter operator or university. The proposal, borrowed from a similar approach in Louisiana, passed narrowly this year but was only partially funded. It will probably be subject to a lawsuit.

Although some national reformers wonder whether the plans will have a sizable impact, many Democratic lawmakers in Virginia said the plans signal a troubling shift.

“There’s no doubt this is a major change,” House Minority Leader David J. Toscano (D-Charlottesville) said. “We’re moving more to private initiatives and private alternatives to public education. At the same time, we’re moving toward more state control of education.”

Democrats also fought hard against the governor’s initial efforts to roll back job protections for teachers. McDonnell made an unsuccessful attempt last year to abolish due process for teachers facing termination.

This year, he came back with support from the teachers union and won passage of a less radical bill that pushes back a teacher’s probation from three years to five, part of his original plan, but preserves due process. The bill clarifies that a teacher can be recommended for dismissal after one unfavorable evaluation.

His early advocacy for performance pay finally resulted in a $15 million optional grant program passed this year, although only about $5 million was set aside in the budget.

Many critics said a challenge for McDonnell’s reform package overall was an unwillingness to put enough resources behind new initiatives, a holdup that will make it difficult for them to succeed.

Allen said reform-oriented investors and entrepreneurs have been watching Virginia since McDonnell was elected to see whether it might be a promising place to work. But she said that lately they have been saying, “Oh my gosh, it probably won’t change anytime soon.”

Study: Charter school students learning more

by Celeste Bott
South Bend Tribune
March 11, 2013

An average Michigan charter school student will learn more in a year than his or her public school peer, according to a new report by Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes.

The study found that students from Michigan charter schools learn an average of two month’s more of math and reading per academic year.

Twenty-seven percent of the state’s charter school students are from Detroit, and Detroit charter school students gained up to three months’ worth of additional education, it said.

Charter schools are publicly funded but can be privately run. They were established in part so that individual schools could have more independence over curriculum and teaching staff.

Margaret Raymond, director of the center, praised Michigan’s charter school practices, especially given problems that districts like Detroit face.

“These findings show that Michigan has set policies for charter schools to produce consistent high quality across the state,” Raymond said. “The results are especially welcome for students in communities that face significant education challenges.”

It is the center’s first in-depth study of charter schools in the state. A total of 85,650 students attend 276 charters in the state. For the study, 61 schools were too small to be analyzed, resulting in a total study sample of 212 charters.

Not all of the findings were favorable to the alternative public schools, however.

For example, 14 percent of Michigan charter schools showed below average growth and achievement, and 25 percent of students perform below average in math.

Devora Davis, a co-author of the report, attributed those conflicting numbers to the use of averages — there are both struggling charters and high-performing charters that distort the data.

The poor performances are offset by the growing proportion of charters with high-level achievement, Davis said.

“Should these trends continue, the share of schools which currently lag the state averages would be expected to decline,” Davis said. “These absolute improvements are within sight in Michigan.”

Stanford’s earlier national study in 2009 was heavily criticized by the Center for Education Reform — based in Washington, D.C. — for its use of inaccurate state data.

According its president, Jeanne Allen, the new study done in Michigan and a similar one done in New Jersey use an improved methodology.

“In these state-level studies, it appears that the inclusion of a wider range of students and more school-level data were used to identify and compare individuals to their ‘traditional public school’ counterparts,” Allen said.

Doing so provided a more realistic view of students, and therefore, more credible results, she said.

Other experts are still critical of the study.

For instance, Amber Arellano, executive director of the Royal Oak-based Education Trust-Midwest, said that the use of averages in the study actually hides more accurate results, and she called for more government accountability for charter quality.

“The study’s focus on average charter student learning gains masks some great disparities in Michigan charter performance,” Arellano said. “Some charter schools are doing well and should be recognized for that.

Other criticisms included the study’s failure to account for the more than 30 new charter schools that opened this fall, or the more than 20 percent of previously established charters whose schools were too small for CREDO’s study standards, as well as the fact that most charter high schools weren’t studied at all.

Michael Van Beek, director of education policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy in Midland, said that it was important to remember that many students attending charter schools are among the poorest in the nation.

“Based on the well-established relationship between test scores and student poverty, one should expect most Michigan’s charter public schools to score below the state average since they serve a higher portion of poor students,” Van Beek said.

“The Stanford study says 70 percent of charter public school students qualify for a free or reduced-price lunch compared to 43 percent in conventional public schools,” he said.

New Front in Charter Schools

by Jennifer Levitz
Wall Street Journal
March 11, 2013

While other states also have weighed lifting caps, charter advocates point to left-leaning Massachusetts as a somewhat unlikely model for the movement. “This demonstrates that charter schools are a viable reform,” said Nina Rees, president of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a nonprofit aimed at advancing the movement. “If it can happen in Massachusetts, it can happen anywhere.”

Charter schools receive public funding but, unlike public schools, employ mostly nonunion teachers and have autonomy in school districts, which allows them to set their own conditions, such as longer school days. They have long been embraced by Republicans for introducing choice in education, but have been assailed by some teacher unions and others as hurting traditional public schools.

The Massachusetts legislation to end the cap was proposed by Democrats, state Sen. Barry Finegold and Rep. Russell Holmes. It would abolish all caps on charter schools and charter-school spending in 29 low-performing school districts, including Boston.

The 107,000-member Massachusetts Teachers Association is likely to oppose the bill, said union president Paul Toner. Under state law, schools’ funding is linked to the number of attending students, so charter schools divert much-needed funds from traditional schools, he said.

While some say capping the number of charter schools controls the quality of education, others say the caps are arbitrary and limit opportunity. Nationally, about 20 states have laws limiting the expansion of charter schools, according to the Center for Education Reform, a group that advocates for charter schools. Hawaii, Idaho and Missouri lifted caps last year.

Massachusetts’ current limit on charter schools statewide is 120, with 76 now in operation. State law also caps districts’ net school spending on charter tuition to 18% in underperforming districts and 9% in others. Statewide, charter groups say there are 45,000 applicants on waiting lists, though that number may include students who apply to multiple schools.

Mr. Finegold, the bill’s sponsor and the son of public-school teachers, said his motivation sprung from conversations with parents in Lawrence, part of his district northwest of Boston, where the struggling school district was taken over by the state in 2011. The state has since brought in charter operators to run two low-performing schools, and parents told him, “we’d be out of here” had that not happened, Mr. Finegold said. “One thing I don’t think people realize—charter schools are keeping a lot of the middle class in cities,” he said.

A coalition of charter advocates, charitable leaders and business groups—including the Pioneer Institute, a free-market Boston think tank—are pushing for the bill. But it has plenty of critics. The popular liberal Massachusetts blog Blue Mass Group wrote recently that Mr. Finegold “throws away his political future,” having “taken the lead for school privatization.”

In the Democratic-controlled legislature, the prospects for the bill, which was only recently unveiled, aren’t yet clear. Gov. Deval Patrick, a Democrat and supporter of charter schools, declined to comment on the legislation. His point person on the issue, Mitchell Chester, the state’s commissioner of elementary and secondary education, said he would consider raising the cap, but perhaps in three years. Massachusetts is now adding new charter schools “incrementally and in a way that makes sense,” Mr. Chester said.

Because other states look to Massachusetts—where students overall routinely rank at the top of national and international tests—for lessons on academic achievement and innovation, the Bay State’s policies on charter schools are being followed closely, former Florida education commissioner Gerard Robinson told charter advocates gathered in Boston recently.

Nationally, charter schools are educating more than 2.3 million students in the 2012-13 school year, 275,000 more than last year, the largest single-year jump since the movement began 20 years ago, according to the National Alliance for Charter Schools.

More than 31,000 Massachusetts students attend charter schools, an increase of 20% in the past four years. Parents like Tori Willis, a widow who moved her 17-year-old son, Asante Sandiford, from a traditional Boston public school to City on a Hill charter school three years ago, are drawn to the focus on college preparation and manners. Asante must tuck in his shirt, and he shakes hands with the headmaster each day.

Unlike many other states, advocates say, Massachusetts’ governance system designates state education officials as sole authorizers of independently run charter schools, overruling local mayors and unions.

“We set a high bar for what it takes to get a charter. We watch them closely, and we exit those charters that don’t measure up,” said Mr. Chester, adding that the state has had to close a few.

The majority of Massachusetts charter schools are high-performing, with many surpassing their districts in terms of student achievement, said Mr. Chester.

Massachusetts ranks its schools from Level One, the highest, to Level Five based on academic achievement, graduation and dropout rates. This year, 59% of charter schools in the state were Level One, compared with 31% of non-charter schools.

In a move being watched nationally, Massachusetts has begun enlisting its best charter-school operators to help turn around several struggling traditional public schools. Typically, charter operators open new schools from scratch, Mr. Chester said.

“If you can’t use this state as a point for lifting the cap…I don’t know what else you can use,” said Ms. Rees, of the national charter-school alliance.

Parent-Driven Education Gains Ground in States

by Ashley Bateman
Heartland News
March 6, 2013

Ten states rank a cut above the rest in offering parents extensive opportunities to control their children’s education, according to the 2013 Parent Power Index from the Center for Education Reform.

Indiana ousted formerly first-ranked Florida for the top seat. Florida ranked second, followed by Ohio, Arizona, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Utah.

“Indiana surpassed Florida because they looked at Florida, saw their lessons, [and] tried to surpass them and do more,” said Kara Kerwin, a Center for Education Reform (CER) vice president.

Empowering parents increases student achievement, the center also found.

One Index to Rule Them All
A myriad of school reform organizations have taken to ranking states according to what policies they prefer.

“As more and more reports are out there it’s really hard for parents to understand what it all means,” Kerwin said. “We decided to take everything we’ve been looking at for all these years and put it into one simple and user-friendly index.”

The Parent Power Index (PPI) measures states five ways: school choice, charter schools, online learning, teacher quality, and transparency. It also provides summaries of state education laws and quick links to often-requested state sites, positioning itself as a parent-empowerment tool.

“We think that [the index] is asking all the right questions,” said William Mattox, a resident fellow at the James Madison Institute in Florida. “In the larger school choice movement, we want to see competition on all sorts of levels. …so that everyone is seeking to improve their quality and give students the kind of education they deserve.”

Recognizing, Serving Parents
The index recognizes “ the role of parents in selecting schools, not only being able to choose their own schools and escaping failure but to reinvent and restructure the schools that are in their community,” said education analyst RiShawn Biddle.

He recommended that future indexes measure Parent Trigger laws’ effectiveness, state teacher pension debt, and school choice for under-noticed groups such as Native Americans.

CER researchers and interns tested the user-friendliness of websites nationwide, rating websites on ease of navigation and intuitive design. Parents frequently ask to have easy-to-use education websites, said Virginia Walden Ford, a longtime parent activist and founder of the Black Alliance for Educational Options. Easy, quick access to information is key to empowering parents, she said.

“So many of those websites are so difficult to navigate, taking hours and hours to find one thing, and that discourages parents from getting involved and getting information,” Ford said.

Top States
This second publication of the index indicates pro-parent state policies have increased markedly. The index uses National Council for Teacher Quality rankings on teacher quality and Digital Learning Now metrics for online education.

Indiana gained points for improving its charter school law, a statewide voucher program for thousands of children, and strong online learning policy. Florida holds a bevy of charter schools and voucher programs, which have helped boost student achievement, especially for minorities, research has shown. Its user-friendly websites and high ranking for online learning opportunities also contributed to a high score. The index cited the lack of a Parent Trigger law—which allows parents to require one of several reforms at their children’s failing school—as a drawback.

“We are pleased that Florida ranks high in the rankings, but also pleased that they acknowledged that there is room for additional growth on our part,” Mattox said. “Dropping from one to two says we need to raise our game.”

Everyone Can Improve
Ohio ranked third, partly due to a recently passed Parent Trigger law. The state boasts hundreds of quality charter schools, above-average teacher quality, and extensive online opportunities.

No. 1 Indiana received a score of 84 percent out of 100, as even great states can improve, Kerwin said. Pennsylvania has some of the largest virtual schools in the country, but recent legislation to cut them will likely reduce family choices and be reflected in the next ranking, she said.

“Parents are very, very responsive to whatever information they can get, they’re hungry for it,” Ford said. “It makes for such a greater, more-informed citizen.”

Learn more:
Parent Power Index, Center for Education Reform: https://2024.edreform.com/in-the-states/parent-power-index/.

LePage bringing national teaching and learning experts to Maine for education summit

by Christopher Cousins
Bangor Daily Herald
March 7, 2013

School choice and education reforms championed by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush will get top billing later this month at an education summit set up by Gov. Paul LePage.

The summit, promised by LePage during his State of the State Address, will feature speakers from all over the country, according to new details about the summit released Thursday.

“We are bringing national experts to Maine to demonstrate what other states are doing and why we are being left behind,” said LePage. “We can no longer stand still, we cannot wallow in the status quo. The rest of the country and the world is passing us by.”

During his State of the State speech, the governor said he favors school choice and charter schools because they provide more choices for students, though opponents of those ideas say they funnel too much taxpayer money away from public schools. A LePage proposal to open up school choice in Maine failed to gain legislative approval, though his initiative to create charter schools in Maine passed. The state’s first two charter schools opened last year.

“School choice benefits all kids who deserve the best education that we can provide,” said LePage during the speech. “Giving students options such as charter schools is more than just a political position.”

LePage said he spends a lot of his free time studying education reform, which has been at the core of his priorities as governor. The education summit is billed as a venue to breed new ideas.

The March 22 summit at Cony High School in Augusta will feature keynote speaker Dr. Tony Bennett, the commissioner of education in Florida, and the first session is titled “The Florida Story.” Three employees of the Foundation for Excellence in Education, which was founded by Bush in 2008 as an education reform think tank, will speak during the morning session: Patricia Levesque, the foundation’s CEO, Matthew Ladner, its senior policy advisor, and Mike Thomas, who runs the foundation’s communications department.

The second session, titled “Stretching the School Dollar,” will feature Eric Lerum, vice president of national policy for StudentsFirst, another national think tank pursuing education reform. StudentsFirst was founded by education policy guru Michelle Rhee, author of “Radical: Fighting to Put Students First.” Also speaking will be Dr. Alden Monberg, a retired Maine Maritime Academy professor. In addition to her experience with the academy, Monberg is a former member of the Orono School Committee, served on the board of directors for the Region 4 United Technologies Center and was a director for the Maine School Board Association.

The third session is titled School Choice. LePage’s administration has been a vocal supporter of school choice, which allows students to pick the school they wish to attend and have public education dollars fund their tuition. The speakers in this session will include Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform; Rep. Alisha Morgan, a Democrat in the Georgia House of Representatives, recipient of the “Champion for Choice” award from the American Federation for Children; and Rene Menard, head of school for Thornton Academy in Saco.

University Academy Tour in Missouri

March 7, 2013

Stephanie Heishman, CER’s senior development director, was in Kansas City on Monday and had the opportunity to tour University Academy, a Kansas City K-12 college prep charter school that serves approximately 1,000 students.

The mission of University Academy is to prepare students to succeed in an institution of higher education and to become leaders in society. The vision of University Academy is to be the best K-12 college-preparatory charter public school in the country, with an emphasis on college preparation, career development, community service and leadership.

All grade levels attend classes in the same building, teachers are masters in their content and each teacher’s classroom is identified by their university or college alma mater- giving students a clear focus on the importance of getting into and completing college.

At the entrance of the school is the “Wall of Honor,” showcasing University Academy graduates and the university or college they are attending.

Kudos to University Academy for all the work they are doing to uphold their mission and vision of providing kids a quality education that will prepare them for life after K-12 schooling.

Newswire: March 5, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 9

OK PINOCCHIO. Last week, Newswire sparked a mini-debate on what the sequester really means for education. But as CER president Jeanne Allen points out in today’s National Journal, “… that among all of these thousands of entities that spend and receive federal money, no one seems to know or to be even talking about how the almighty federal dollar flows.” The reality that CER continues to point out, is that most of the money has already been collected by states and districts. Thankfully we’re not alone in holding the Administration accountable for irresponsible rhetoric about a frenzy of “pink slips.” In fact, the US Department of Education has yet to produce any district-level evidence of lay-offs, according to the Wall Street Journal.

COVER UP. The Worcester County Teachers Association in Maryland has been making headlines as news broke of their botched attempt to cover-up the fact that Denise Inez Owens, the union’s former treasurer embezzled over $430,000 of teacher dues to fund her gambling addiction. In 2009 when the MSEA (state affiliate of the NEA) learned of the crime, they merely forced Owens to resign. We know these union contracts are ironclad, but come on, they sent a known-criminal back to teaching in a middle school classroom! Finally justice has been served, but where’s the accountability and “common good” that the union leadership supposedly values?

EXPANDING CHOICE. In a press conference last week Alabama Governor Robert Bentley applauded the legislature for sending an individual and corporate tax credit bill to his desk, “I truly believe this is historic education reform and it will benefit students and families across Alabama regardless of their income and regardless of where they live. I’m so proud we have done this for the children of this state and especially the children who are in failing school systems and had no way out. Now, they have a way out.” We couldn’t agree more Governor Bentley; now get back to the drawing board to finally bring charters to your state. There must be something in the water because in his 2013 Budget Address last week, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie proposed a $2 million pilot opportunity scholarship program for low-income students in failing schools. A small plan, but at least it’s a start.

ON CHARTERS. Charter schools will be all the buzz in Tennessee and Mississippi state houses today. The Volunteer state’s House Education Committee will take up HB 702, a very modest proposal that would allow the state board of education to authorize charter schools on an appeal. Currently only local school boards and the Achievement School District can authorize charter schools. Charter school leaders and parents are rallying in Nashville in support of the proposal.

Today, Mississippi lawmakers are poised to act on legislation expanding charter schools in the state, trying to resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of bills. Some issues include: whether school boards in districts with “C’’ ratings will be able to veto charter schools, whether students will be able to cross district lines to attend charter schools elsewhere, whether schools will be able to join the state pension system, and whether for-profit companies will be allowed to run charter schools.

VIRTUAL VINDICATION. Yesterday, the lead plaintiff in a class action securities lawsuit against K12 Inc. voluntarily and permanently dismissed their claims made about K12-managed schools, helping to drown out the often-unsubstantiated charges similarly made by critics and echoed repeatedly by the media. With a bit of luck, the dismissal of these claims will help put to rest these charges and serve as a sort of virtual vindication.

Leadership Goes Beyond Pinocchio’s Noses

by Jeanne Allen
Response to “Arne Duncan’s Distracting Gaffe“, National Journal
March 5, 2013

Irresponsible Leadership That Goes Beyond Pinocchio’s Noses

The Center for Education Reform wrote last week about the Chicken Little behavior this administration is leading on education, along with countless school leaders and association spokespeople. We are happy to have sparked a mini-debate on the subject! But what remains absolutely astonishing is that among all of these thousands of entities that spend and receive federal money, no one seems to know or to be even talking about how the almighty federal dollar flows.

NEWS FLASH — there isn’t a pool of money sitting in the Department of the Treasury with educational purpose just waiting to be cut. The reality is MOST OF THE MONEY FOR THIS YEAR – almost 90% of it — has been drawn down or collected by states and districts!!! Some states — like New Jersey — already have all of their money for the year.

Of that which remains — limited Title funds, some Head Start, for example — between 5-8% of the remaining 10% will likely be reduced. That amounts to less a half a percent overall for the year!

I’ve personally called people who should know whether and how federal spending flows and what might be left that states need, yet they’ve been clueless. There is no public information available by the US Department of Education that shows what has been distributed to every state and district and what remains. Without data, no wonder school districts are in a tizzy!

It’s easy to incite outrage when our leaders — who the public presumes understand policy and budgets — tell people they are going to lose their beloved teachers, the arts, after-school, food, early childhood and more.

The reality is that while school and school district bean counters most likely know for certain what money they have, what funds they might lose and how, the US Education Secretary clearly doesn’t, and superintendents and school board officials aren’t saying. After all, it’s easier to create a problem than a solution.

That’s plausible, some might say, but what about the fiscal year that starts October 1?

Well, Congress must contend with pending budget issues regardless of sequestration, and yes the uncertainly of spending levels absolutely affects the plans some may have had. Schools and districts should prepare for the kind of reduction that is often caused by natural enrollment fluctuations when student populations change, either due to birth rate impact, changes in regional composition, or even competition.

Financial fluctuations are a fact of life for most public enterprises. It’s not new and it happens every few years for schools, regardless of who’s in power. In the all-important enterprise of education, it’s time we recognize that what we know and how we conduct ourselves is especially critical to the children and students whose lives we aspire to improve. We must demonstrate that truth, problem-solving, intellectual rigor and the ability to weather any storm are critical attributes worth having and worth learning, in and out of school.

A Pretty Good Sales Pitch For MA Charter Schools

March 1, 2013

In a follow-up to their initial 2009 report on the Bay State, CREDO has released its latest Charter School Performance Report on Massachusetts, a six year study that analyzes the effectiveness of Massachusetts’s charter schools and in particular, their performance in the Boston area.

The report was largely positive on both math and reading tests, notably when comparing Boston charter schools to their public school counterparts. When analyzing just Beantown charters, the report found that 83 percent had significantly positive learning gains in both reading and math and no city charters were performing lower than the local public schools. That’s a pretty good sales pitch for charter schools in Massachusetts.

For a little more background on CER’s long history with CREDO and our concerns with their methodology, which they use in this report, here’s a link to help you out: a little intro to CREDO.

Why Truly Independent and Multiple Authorizers Are Important

February 28, 2013

It’s not surprising that Louisiana’s charter school authority expansion fell flat in its first year.

Louisiana’s experience is proof that not all efforts to improve laws are created equal. Strong charter school laws do not require new groups to apply to become authorizers. It is actually a disincentive to do so.

Strong laws permit universities and other publicly accountable non-education entities to become authorizers without asking permission and hold them accountable for the outcomes of their schools. That’s because the purpose of independent and multiple authorizers is to establish new pathways for school creation and oversight separate from existing state and local education agencies.

States that allow for truly independent authorizers, granted by law to operate with unbridled freedom, yield greater charter school growth and quality.