Sign up for our newsletter

Jindal’s charter authority expansion initiative falls flat in first year

by Danielle Dreilinger
Times-Picayune
February 27, 2013

It was one of the more controversial provisions of Gov. Bobby Jindal’s 2012 education reform package: allowing local nonprofits, public agencies and colleges to grant charters to schools. But when the deadline passed last week for interested entities to submit a letter of intent, not a single group wanted in.

That was a surprise to Scott Richard, executive director of the Louisiana School Boards Association. “I would’ve expected at least one or two applications,” he said. The association is a plaintiff in a school vouchers lawsuit against the department.

Before the state law was passed last year, the power to authorize charters had been restricted to local school districts and the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.

The spokesman for the state Department of Education downplayed the lack of applicants. “It was the first year and we did have lots of interest,” said Barry Landry. “Groups are still considering [it].”

The provision is part of a number of changes that aim to expand the number of charters in Louisiana. Even with the state’s high visibility for recent education reforms, fewer than 10 percent of public schools are charters, according to Department of Education data released in January.

Like local and state school boards, a local charter authority would receive, evaluate and grant applications for independent groups to open schools, and then evaluate the performance of those schools. Students could come from anywhere in the state.

Charter advocates and opponents had a number of explanations for why no one took advantage of the opportunity, including limited outreach, tough rules and general satisfaction with the current chartering system.

For one, the eligibility standards are stringent. Applicants must have an educational mission, at least $500,000 in net assets, and have been incorporated for at least 3 years — meaning no one can set up a group just to become a charter authorizer.

No administrator can have been convicted of a felony. Authorizers also must have open meetings and make records available to the public.

The evaluation rules are stringent as well. After a local charter authority’s first school has been open for 3 years, the state reviews the performance of all the group’s schools. If they have an average academic performance grade of D or F, the organization loses its authorizing power and the schools are turned over to the state. An average of C means the group holds on to its schools but cannot authorize any new ones until scores improve.

That’s a high bar, said John Ayers, executive director of Tulane University’s Cowen Institute. “Charter schools often seek to educate hard-to-serve youngsters, who are often behind state averages on scholastic aptitude metrics. Getting all your schools to C in 3 years is a big challenge.”

The state also could intervene and rescind a charter at any time if it found a school neglected, abused or mistreated students.

Ayers and various Louisiana charter advocates approve of those rules. “You can’t just give a free hand to charter authorizers,” said Neerav Kingsland, CEO of New Schools for New Orleans. “I think Louisiana’s law was cognizant of that.”

State Rep. Steve Carter, R-Baton Rouge, who worked on the bill, said local community leaders had expressed interest in starting schools to meet needs in a region. “Until now, they have had to work through the current system to do so,” he said.

But when the law was written last year there was no groundswell of nonprofits clamoring to become chartering authorities, said Caroline Roemer Shirley, executive director of the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools: “It was not based on demand.”

Rather, it was a top-down decision aligned with national policy trends. Influential organizations including the Center for Education Reform, StudentsFirst and the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools emphasize the importance of having multiple pathways to create charters. Currently, 19 states plus the District of Columbia allow for “independent and multiple authorizers,” said Kara Kerwin of the Center for Education Reform.

The national experience with local charter authorities has been mixed and may have dissuaded some potential applicants. In New York, the state university network charters schools and has been generally well regarded. But overall it hasn’t gone well, said Ayers. In Indiana, Ball State University is reviewing nearly half of the 42 schools it has chartered and already pulled seven charters, according to reports.

“The extremely problematic Ohio charter movement is the poster child for why this is generally not a good idea, and my understanding is that people pointed that problem out to Gov. Jindal’s people as they pushed for the approach last winter,” Ayers said.

Schools also might not want to apply to local charter authorities for their charters. “It’s such a big unknown,” said Jonathan Bertsch, director of advocacy for KIPP New Orleans. Under the Recovery School District, KIPP has access to school buildings and clear evaluation standards. “Right now we’re in a pretty stable situation and that’s worked for us,” he said, though “it’s definitely an interesting idea.”

The new provision also hasn’t had much visibility. BESE passed the policy in October 2012 with little fanfare. Landry said the Department of Education had preliminary conversations with some foundations and nonprofits but no formal outreach or training.

It hasn’t been a focus for the Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools either. “It’s a great opportunity,” said Roemer Shirley. “There needs to be some effort behind it. There’s a lot of other moving parts right now.”

In most parts of the state, she said, she still needs to explain that charter schools are public.

Honoring Rosa Parks: Supporter of Freedom for Families Choosing Schools

February 27, 2013

The Rosa Parks statue was unveiled today in Washington D.C. at the Capitol’s Statuary Hall.

The statue portrays Rosa clutching her purse, reminding observers of the courageous moment when she refused to give up her seat. It is a permanent reminder of the cause she embodied and stood for — freedom.

Freedom is a characteristic that is hallmark to the charter school movement. So how appropriate that citizens in California, when asked to choose a name for a new charter school, chose to name the school “Rosa Parks Academy” in her honor.

Newswire: February 26, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 8

SKYFALL? The impending Sequestration may not be a Bond movie but it has almost everyone painting a doomsday outlook for education cuts in the U.S. But in reality it’s actually a lot more like “Chicken Little” despite the protestations of our nation’s leaders. Said Secretary Duncan yesterday “There’s no one in their right mind who would say this is good for kids and good for the country, yet somehow it becomes tenable in Washington. I just think people don’t spend enough time in the real world.” Actually, Mr. Secretary, the Real World has already received most of its federal education funds for the year, making severe cuts in personnel and programs literally a choice, not a necessity. For example, all Title I funds for the year have already been delivered and distributed in the state of New Jersey, so any perceived spending cut backs would happen to new spending, not current programs. This is the case in almost all states – Title funds are allocated and forward-funded, and while some federal spending may have to be reconciled over certain periods, currently most schools, districts and states already have their 10% of federal funds in hand for the year. Come July, it’s another story, but then again, sequestration is not about July, it’s about now, and there is no doomsday coming for schools. It’s reminiscent of the hue and cry over the recession that led to the stimulus funds – which ended up being extra money, as districts never did face the cuts they had planned for and the new money kept coming. The whole affair should remind the American people that we don’t exactly spend wisely in education as a nation, and while money is important, it’s how we spend that’s more important. Just ask a charter school.

MEGA MEDIOCRITY. Last week the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) released a report on the five mega-states – California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Texas – that represent 40% of our nation’s public schoolchildren. The results were not surprising, considering it was based on the 2011 data, but all too telling that 30 years later, we are still A Nation at Risk. There were some positives, though. Check out our analysis.

SOMETHING WORTH RISING FOR. Mississippi has been the laggard state in the charter school arena, something the newly elected leadership in November vowed to do something about. Bills were passed in both the state’s House and Senate to make modest improvements in the state’s “F” rated law, by giving the state authority to approve charters while limiting charters outside of district approval to districts that rate a D or F on the state’s accountability system. It’s too little and it’s late, and debate over whether another authorizer will be allowed is still simmering. The astonishing piece of this (and so many other states) is that many a House Republican feels so beholden to its school boards and superintendents that they have been kowtowed into opposing anything truly meaningful for kids. That’s another battle to be fought but at least this southern state could rise for good reason if the lawmakers unite and get a good law enacted.

COLLEGE BOUND. Congrats to Alassane Traore, a senior at DC’s Friendship Collegiate Academy, for earning a full scholarship to Hanover College. Traore was surprised to learn he won the scholarship out of 200 applicants, and now will be the first in his family to attend college. Traore told the news he couldn’t have overcome adversity without the support and academics of Friendship. This success is not unusual at Friendship Public Charter Schools, just last month we shared the news of three other students winning full scholarships to attend four-year colleges. CER Board Member Donald Hense founded Friendship Public Charter Schools in 1997, which now operates 6 public charter schools and, in partnership with Baltimore City and DC Public Schools, manages five turnaround schools, serving nearly 8,000 students from age 3 to 12th grade.

ALL EYES ON MA. Thousands of families across Massachusetts are anxiously awaiting the deliberations of the State Board of Education meeting today where 5 new applicants will be approved or rejected, and 11 existing schools will learn if they’ll be renewed. Today’s meeting comes on the heels of proposed legislation that would eliminate the cap for new charter schools in the lowest 10% of performing districts. A good step forward for sure, but unless they raise the 9% cap on total district spending for charters, it is a modest proposal at best. What would really give the Bay State a boost in its law ranking is full elimination of any and all caps and allowing for multiple authorizers to open and approve new schools to meet extreme demand.  is full elimination of any and all caps and allowing for multiple authorizers to open and approve new schools to meet extreme demand. All eyes will be on the newly seated Secretary and former Brockton Super, Matt Malone, who was at the center of the battle to stop Brockton Charter earlier this year, and where now all authority rests for new schools at the state level.

NC Legislature’s Focus On Education

“Legislature focused on education reform”
by Arika Herron
Winston-Salem-Journal
February 25, 2013

Just one month into its general session, North Carolina’s state legislature has already proposed more than 30 bills related to education.

From Senate Bill 68’s proposal to require arts education for graduation, to House Bill 44 calling for the state to transition away from funding textbooks in favor of digital learning, it’s clear that education reform will be a goal for the General Assembly this year.

Gov. Pat McCrory has already called for sweeping changes to the state’s education system. Education reform played a major part in McCrory’s campaign for the state’s top office. In his first State of the State address Monday, McCrory called for a change on the education debate.

“Instead of focusing the debate only on the budget, we must now demand results,” he said. “We must ensure that our schools are preparing students for success by effectively teaching them both the knowledge and the skills that will help them lead productive lives and also find jobs.”

The first bill McCrory signed into law since taking office in January puts a premium on career and technical education. The new law encourages students to enroll in courses that will lead to a diploma with an endorsement indicating that they are either “career ready,” “college ready” or both. It also directs the State Board of Education to update the curriculum for career and technical education courses.

“We must ensure our education system provides opportunities and pathways for our students to get the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfill their post-graduation goals, whether that be entering the workforce or continuing on to getting a higher degree,” McCrory said in a statement.

The bill is the first, but likely not the last, piece of education reform the legislature will send to McCrory this session. The House has followed McCrory’s lead; more than 30 bills related to education have already been filed this year, and more are on the way. Legislators are prepared to tackle teacher tenure, charter school expansion and private school vouchers – all issues that could have major impacts for local school districts.

“Every legislative session, there are a lot of bills filed. A lot of them will never go very far but to monitor them is a task,” said Don Martin, superintendent for Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schoola. “There’s a lot of trying to read the tea leaves.”

Martin said school choice proposals – like those that would expand charter schools and allow private school vouchers – have the most potential to affect local districts.

McCrory’s rhetoric is not the only factor driving the education reform talk in Raleigh. State Sen. Peter Brunstetter, R-Forsyth, said education reform really got started in the House two years ago when Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, started driving the agenda in the Senate. While some pieces of that package were passed, Brunstetter said their work is not done. He expects talk about teacher tenure and performance to be hot button issues this session and talk about charter schools expansion to continue.

“We are not satisfied with the status quo in public education,” Brunstetter said. “But we have successfully started the dialogue that was long overdue in terms of what we can do to improve the quality of public education at the K-12 level.”

Brunstetter has his own ideas about how to improve education. He is the primary sponsor of a bill that would require students to complete at least one credit of arts education to graduate. Brunstetter said he sees value in arts education, even for students who do not necessarily plan on pursuing a future in the arts.

“The idea is it gives students critical thinking skills that pay dividends in areas way beyond art itself,” Brunstetter said. “It exposes students who might not otherwise get exposure to arts.”

It’s too early now to know which, if any of these bills, will get passed and what finals versions will dictate. For now, it’s a game of waiting, watching and trying to keep up with the legislature’s feverish pace.

That has some concerned, who say making so many changes so quickly could result in some unintended consequences. Rep. Ed Hanes, D-Forsyth, said he’s keeping a close eye on how legislation supported by the Republican-controlled state government might impact marginalized and underserved student populations. Hanes said there are ideas floating around in Raleigh that could help or hurt such groups.

“If we’re not careful and we’re not thoughtful, with our pace with the changes being considered… the poorest people are always in the most vulnerable position,” Hanes said. “We can’t move so fast we miss people on the margins.”

Hanes said he hopes proposals for expanded charter systems and private school vouchers – some versions of which would help increase school choice for the state’s poorest students – get fair looks.

Last year, the legislature lifted the cap on the number of charter schools that could be approved in the state. Charter school expansion is inevitable, Lambeth said, leading many districts looking for ways to compete and benefit from charter schools’ lack of regulations.

There’s been talk in the state also about private school vouchers. A bill filed in 2011 would have provided tax credits for parents who remove their children from public school, helping to cover the cost of private tuition. The move would essentially take at least a portion of the tax dollars that go to public schools for each student and give it to private institutions. That bill, House Bill 41, never made it out of committee, but legislators say they expect similar proposals to surface this year. Similar provisions have already been provided for students with special needs that are not being met by traditional public schools.

“The general tenor is to allow parents to have as much choice and decision-making ability for their children as possible,” Lambeth said.

Those proposals are likely to be some of the most contentious. Martin said superintendents across the state are keeping a close watch especially on the voucher proposal. Vouchers would allow students to take public dollars and use them to attend private school.

“It’s really causing a lot of angst among school folks,” Martin said. “It’s a line that should not be crossed.”

Rep. Donny Lambeth, R-Forsyth, said he expects to have a charter school bill filed next month to allow communities to create entire charter school districts. The idea is to give traditional school systems some of the flexibility enjoyed by charters. Lambeth, former chairman of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education, said there is talk of creating a new education caucus to help take a closer look at the dozens of education-related bills.

“It does seem like there is a really high level of interest in a number of education topics,” Lambeth said.

Other likely hot topics this year are school security, student achievement and digital learning.

Senate Bills 27 and 59 would allow for additional armed personnel in schools. Senate Bill 16 would revoke a driver’s license for illegally passing a stopped school bus. Lambeth and Hanes are putting together a bill that’s expected to be filed soon and will “add teeth” to existing laws around school bus stop arm violations.

Lambeth is also collaborating on a two separate bills to address high school dropouts.

Three separate House bills address digital learning – calling for additional spending, more funds and new teaching standards on digital learning.

“It’s a new day down here,” Lambeth said. “There is so much new energy and ideas being brought by the new people.”

Tennessee Lawmakers To Take Up Vouchers

“Capitol Hill Conversation – Voucher Time”
by Blake Farmer
Nashville Public Radio
February 25, 2013

Governor Bill Haslam vaguely referenced school vouchers in his State of the State speech last month, and now his limited proposal is up for debate in the legislature. Committees begin their work on the bill this week.

Haslam’s plan limits the program to paying private school tuition only for poor students from failing schools. But many lawmakers would like to see a much wider reach, including the sponsors tapped to carry the governor’s legislation.

“What I’ve told people who really want to expand it, you know down here, votes are everything,” says Rep. Bill Dunn (R-Knoxville). “If you can come to me with 50, 55 votes saying they want the expanded version, then we can talk to the governor about expanding it.”

State Sen. Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown) is the other sponsor. He led several failed attempts to allow vouchers, though no bill had the weight of the governor behind it.

Haslam pumped the breaks on Kelsey’s voucher push in 2011, organizing a panel to study the issue. The governor was initially skeptical that vouchers were the answer to improving education in Tennessee, acknowledging a program of any size does take money from public schools and shift it into private institutions.

Shifting Support
A dozen states already have voucher programs, which have primarily been championed by Republicans. But vouchers have grown in popularity among education reformers, including former Washington D.C. school chancellor Michelle Rhee, whose lobbying group has been hard at work in Tennessee.

“As a lifelong Democrat I was adamantly against vouchers,” Rhee writes in her new book titled Radical. “Here’s the question we Democrats need to ask ourselves: Are we beholden to the public school system at any cost, or are we beholden to the public school child at any cost?”

Republicans have been the bigger supporters of vouchers, saying they give parents more choice in the matter. Tennessee Democrats have largely opposed vouchers.

“We see that a program that would take public money and put it into private schools would do nothing to help either one,” said House Minority Leader Craig Fitzhugh (D-Ripley).

But geography is turning out to be a factor for many lawmakers, not just party affiliation.

In Memphis, which has the highest concentration of struggling schools, Democrats like Rep. John DeBerry have become open to vouchers.

Vouchers begin to lose support from some Republicans if the program were opened up to more than just poor students at the state’s lowest-performing schools. Rural GOP lawmakers are already hearing concerns from their local school boards.

“They’re worried that it does take money away from public schools,” says Senate Speaker Ron Ramsey (R-Blountville). “I’m not convinced of that.”

Nuts and Bolts
Under the governor’s plan:

– To qualify, a student has to be enrolled in the bottom 5 percent of schools in overall achievement. This includes half a dozen schools in Nashville. Most are in Memphis.
– The student also has to be part of a household where the income is low enough that he or she qualifies for free or reduced lunch. For a family of four, that’s roughly $42,000.
– The program is currently capped at 5,000 students next year, bumping up to 20,000 by the 2016-2017 school year.

For the schools taking vouchers:

– A private school would have to accept the voucher of roughly $6,000 as total tuition payment, even if the tuition is more than that.
– They would have to give voucher students the state’s standardized tests and show achievement growth.
– Consecutive years of test scores “significantly below expectations” would disqualify a private school from taking voucher students.

Cost:

– There is no cost estimate for Haslam voucher proposal.
– In theory, it wouldn’t cost the state any more money.
– However, local school districts say they will feel the pinch when money follows students who leave for a private school.

NAEP Mega-States Report: More of the Same

Nation’s Report Card study reveals mega-states lagging national average despite modest gains

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
February 22, 2013

Less than 40 percent of our nation’s 4th and 8th graders are proficient in math and reading. A closer look at the 2011 results of the five states with the largest public school student populations reveals these mega-states generally do not perform better than the nation’s average, but there have been modest achievement gains.

The National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) Mega-States report showcases student results in California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Texas. Collectively, these mega-states represent 40 percent of the nation’s public school students. This report analyzed math and reading scores from 1992 until 2011 and science scores over the last two tests. Four out of the five mega-states had scores higher than the U.S. average in at least one grade level and one subject. Only California performed worse than the nation’s average across the board.

Some states have had greater score gains since 1992 on the math and reading tests, but there’s still a long way to go in terms student comprehension and achievement. Florida showed the most gains in reading for 4th and 8th graders, with average score increases of 16 and eight, respectively, and tied for most gain on 4th grade math. Only Texas in 8th grade math had higher gains over time than Florida.

“This in-depth analysis of The Nation’s Report Card demonstrates the need for bold and aggressive change,” said Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform. “Complacency and mediocrity over the past two decades has starved our nation’s students of their basic rights to knowledge. It is time to accelerate the pace of reform. Our children and economic future depend on it.”

###

Read more on the state of American education here: The State of the Union – A Nation at Risk

NAEP: More of the Same

Nation’s Report Card study reveals mega-states lagging national average despite modest gains

Less than 40 percent of our nation’s 4th and 8th graders are proficient in math and reading. A closer look at the 2011 results of the five states with the largest public school student populations reveals these mega-states generally do not perform better than the nation’s average, but there have been modest achievement gains.

The National Assessment of Education Progress http://nationsreportcard.gov/megastates/(NAEP) Mega-States report showcases student results in California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Texas. Collectively, these mega-states represent 40 percent of the nation’s public school students. This report analyzed math and reading scores from 1992 until 2011 and science scores over the last two tests. Four out of the five mega-states had scores higher than the U.S. average in at least one grade level and one subject. Only California performed worse than the nation’s average across the board.

Some states have had greater score gains since 1992 on the math and reading tests, but there’s still a long way to go in terms student comprehension and achievement. Florida showed the most gains in reading for 4th and 8th graders, with average score increases of 16 and eight, respectively, and tied for most gain on 4th grade math. Only Texas in 8th grade math had higher gains over time than Florida.

“This in-depth analysis of The Nation’s Report Card demonstrates the need for bold and aggressive change,” said Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform. “Complacency and mediocrity over the past two decades has starved our nation’s students of their basic rights to knowledge. It is time to accelerate the pace of reform. Our children and economic future depend on it.”

NYC Charter Achievement Positive Across Multiple Studies

February 20, 2013

The latest CREDO report looks at New York City charter school achievement and finds generally positive results.

CREDO research on other cities and states, like the Michigan report released in January, has generally yielded positive results. But perhaps more interesting is the fact that NYC CREDO findings are in line with work done by other researchers studying New York City charter schools. Check out the studies below for more on charter schools in the Big Apple:

How NYC Charter Schools Affect Achievement:
This study done by Caroline M. Hoxby employs quality charter school research methodology and finds that NYC charter school students will learn more over time than those students who remain in conventional public schools.

The State of the NYC Charter School Sector:
This report from the New York City Charter School Center gives an in-depth look into the city’s charter schools data, demographics and achievement, and indicates that charter schools continue to be a viable alternative for parents looking to better their children’s education in the Big Apple.

And for those of you scratching your head as to why you’ve heard the acronym CREDO before, it may have been because of a controversial and widely cited national report from 2009. Here’s some background to help you out: All About CREDO.

CER Responds to Reuters’ Claims on Charter Selectivity

CER Press Release
Washington, D.C.
February 19, 2013

Concerns over selective admissions criteria out of the scope of accepted methods for charter school enrollments and policies should be taken seriously, and authorizers are obligated to govern school policies according to very clear rules and oversight practices. But whether there are issues in how charter schools enroll students or not because of the actions of an authorizer or school, there is simply no room for conjecture or misappropriation of facts when analyzing how schools conduct themselves.

A series of articles by Reuters News journalist Stephanie Simon released on Feb 15, make erroneous conclusions, misappropriates fact, and makes far-reaching exaggerations of The Center for Education Reform’s (CER) data.

1) Data regarding the free and reduced lunch program provided by CER is completely mischaracterized. CER data shows that most charter schools do indeed feed all of their students, yet nearly 40% do not participate in the federal program because of the limitations that program imposes on their use of resources and the requirements for application and compliance that are not related to providing nutritious meals.

2) Application and enrollment criteria in many of the schools cited is misrepresented as selectivity. The reporting in these articles suggests anyone who does impose information requirements on parents are conducting nefarious or illegal behavior rather than attempting to ensure that the students are seeking the right fit for them. The article fails to recognize the distinction between selective admissions and informational guidance.

3) State policy is entirely misconstrued and the reporter cites several states that expressly permit selectivity. A closer look at the law reveals an incredible lack of understanding of state policy.

CER’s full response to Ms. Simon’s article can be found here. The Center will investigate additional points raised by the reporter and publish those findings subsequently.

Newswire: February 19, 2013

Vol. 15, No. 7

SELECTIVE? It’s irresponsible when facts are distorted, claims unsubstantiated, and balance not offered in the news. A series of articles by Stephanie Simon for Reuters News uncovering selectivity in enrollment at some charter schools was released on Friday. However, what’s not reported – and there’s a lot – is the fact that the reporter had an agenda and chose to be selective in her reporting. We share our colleague’s concerns and admonishment of schools that may be guilty of selectivity, but since CER’s research was so blatantly misreported, we took President’s Day weekend to do some fact-checking, because, after all, our first president taught us all not to tell a lie.

DATA DISTORTION. Apparently, charter schools are “[leaving] low-income parents scrambling to find a way to feed their children.” Or so the reporter concludes using data from CER’s Survey of America’s Charter Schools. As it turns out, participation in the federal free and reduced lunch program is not a good measure for determining socioeconomic status of students attending charter schools. About 40% of charter schools don’t participate in the federal program for a number of reasons, of those, a majority report that their student body would qualify. However, most charters feed all their children, regardless if they participate in the federal program.

DON’T CALL ME STUPID. Here they go again! This isn’t the first time parents have been questioned on their ability to make a choice. In fact, the creaming argument has been around since the first charter school opened its doors. This editor’s getting a little tired of “friends” and opponents alike underestimating parental choice.

NOT UP ON IT. What’s clear going line-by-line in the Reuters’ articles is that the reporter either misunderstood or misconstrued (or both) state policy to make a point. After examining the laws of the states cited as “explicitly selective” none are as selective as the definition goes or as negatively inferred.

Stay tuned for more analysis and fact-checking in the coming days. In the meantime, stay on top of the latest breaking news at www.2024.edreform.com.